<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jack and Jill Politics - Latest Comments in A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/</link><description>A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics</description><atom:link href="https://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/a_worthy_rant_from_booman_on_obama_criticism_from_the_left_blogosphere/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:01:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20268713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, that's not my definition of it. My definition is someone who reacts rabidly and harshly to anyone who criticizes the President in any way, and who has abandoned long-held political convictions in order to conform to whatever he's doing or not doing at any given time. People don't have to "trash" him to be trashed by the cultists. I haven't trashed him, but my simply offering criticism certainly elicited a hysterical response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that you said "&lt;b&gt;openly&lt;/b&gt; and repeatedly trashing the President". That's a bit of a giveaway right there. I mean..."openly"? No shit? Are we living in North Korea, all of a sudden?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20268143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To the extent you've bitched has been about your favorite strawman - "the cultists" - which, according your constant use of the term, is anyone who doesn't agree with the idea of openly and repeatedly trashing the president because he doesn't follow your view of how he should govern. I'm guessing Booman has officially become a cultist in your view because he dares suggest that your tactics may be counterproductive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eclecticbrotha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20265919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's been a &lt;i&gt;whole&lt;/i&gt; lot more bitching and moaning about criticism of the President on this blog. That is what has been incessant...the attempted enforcement of nothing but devoted admiration of everything the President does or doesn't do on a blog that is not owned by the people who would be enforcers. And yes, it's cultish. To the extent that I've bitched, it's mostly been about the behavior of the cultists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20083523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...no response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder why.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carolinagirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20078273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was then, before he became President.  I'm asking about now.  Jane Hamsher certainly doesn't consider herself an ally and you and Jane appear linked at the hips these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Its all good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:02:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20078063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry...but needs to head back to middle school... he/she needs to finish 8th grade..where they teach CIVICS first!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AMEN...BREAK. IT. DOWN!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Why is it that if someone criticizes another's speech, it is seen as "censoring" their speech? If you say the president is a fucknut, then I say that you are a fucknut"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ummm, that's the funny think about folks who are intolerant and pander for tolerance, under the auspices of free speech...they are INTOLERANT of tolerance....calling folks koolaid drinkers and all...they throw the first barb...cause it is free speech and all...but then when they get it thrown back...well they just can't be TOLERant of free speech then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yep that's right...THEY are INTOLERABLES!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:52:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"why don't you research our archives. I was talking about Obama and volunteering and supporting him openly before most Black folks had ever heard of him"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did so. You are a fair weather fan...you were caterwauling and chickenlittling too...as well.  Your strength of conviction has wavered consistently.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The pattern of your posts is like like the last football player to jump on the pile..if everyone else is doin it..then you just GOT to JOIN it...but if it ain't the popular view/act of the moment....you nowhere around.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:50:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I bitch and moan incessantly, do I?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YES!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep!  AS Senator HRC had a national platform as a former FLOTUS.  Did she use it to advocate for ANYthing nationally?  NOPE&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"when did the descriptive "drama queen" become a gay slur"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It has been a term used in the gay culture..but not as a slur.. It probably made it into popular lexicon from the gay culture...it's part of the 'flaming gay' view.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laRapierWit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:40:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20077212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Did you know in that there is the branch called, Congress that creates legislation? That is how DADT will be rid of. Executive orders are not a magical wand that will get rid DADT.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now PBomb, the first thing that needs to be done is send dthomas back to Civics Class in high school! MMMKAY? He/she needs to study Government!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SouthernGirl2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:36:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20076018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bitch and moan incessantly, do I?:) Nah, I just can't ignore some things, that's all. I'm a bad devotee. Sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20075382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said, Weezie.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AxelFoley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20075196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You heard LT, gaylib.  Answer his damn questions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, you don't have any answers, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AxelFoley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20075056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, ain't that some shit, PBomb?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AxelFoley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20074959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The PUMAS and their partners in crime.  Folks on the left who bitch and moan incessantly.  A few here on this site, including you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AxelFoley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20074804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just added Booman to my list of blogs to read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AxelFoley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20074778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way to make em go quiet, PBomb. LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shilohsmama</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:54:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20074237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And it never occurs to them those law came about under her husband's watch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They'll probably respond with saying "Well she wasn't the president" and not realize they're shooting down one of their primary reasons why she'd make a better president.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LTMidnight</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20073625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well what in your rant would you like me to dispute?  I mean if you want to break down that entire rant up above, sure I can do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I know where all of this will lead to.. you would come up with more crazy stuff to say. Usually when I am speaking about policy, I always have facts. Apparently you don't read any of the reponses I have put on this site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't regurgitate right-wing talking points. &lt;br&gt;For instance, this quote of yours,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"discrimination against Gays in the military (an executive order please); a failed Public Option thus far (he spoke positively of the current bill that passed in the Senate Finance committee without a Public Option)"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did you know in that there is the branch called, Congress that creates legislation? That is how DADT will be rid of. Executive orders are not a magical wand that will get rid DADT. Why don't read about how long it took after Truman issued an executive order to get the armed forces integrated. Also, it was a last measure, after he tried to get that branch called Congress to do their job,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.reidreport.com/2009/10/harry-truman-barack-obama-and-the-mythic-executive-order/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.reidreport.com/2009/10/harry-truman-barack-obama-and-the-mythic-executive-order/"&gt;http://blog.reidreport.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Failed Public Option? Wouldn't that indicate there was a final bill? Last time I check there isn't one?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Senate Finance Committee needed to craft a bill. They finance the majority of the social programs used in the United States. Without their bill, healthcare reform would be dead. President Obama is just happy to see some bill come out of that committee. That bill will be combined with the HELP committee bill and then voted on. It could have a public option, but that still wouldn't be a final bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Every major economist has verified the idea that jobs are a lagging indicator. So this theory isn't something that Obama crapped out on his own, it been a tenet of recovering economies after a recession. There is job loss and eventually there will be new jobs produced. But yet again. he's hasn't been office for that long. So we don't what the future holds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Booman is a progressive and you accuse him of being on Obama's payroll? Please provide link that proves your wild accusation. You won't be able to. Booman is a progressive, so someone that is in your camp is calling you out. That's what you do spend all day complaining and criticizing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And maybe you do feel he is "a magic negro", all of the things you listed couldn't be turned around in 9 months, even if Kucinich was elected and in office.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, didn't say something about thee be 40,000 troops being sent over?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You blithered on about that for several rants. I think 14,000 is different from 40,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/afghanistan/la-fg-afghan-troops2-2009sep02,0,6263790,full.story" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/afghanistan/la-fg-afghan-troops2-2009sep02,0,6263790,full.story"&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Didn't you also blather on about continuing the war in Iraq? &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/world/middleeast/09pullout.html?_r=1&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=iraq%20withdrawal&amp;amp;st=cse" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/world/middleeast/09pullout.html?_r=1&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=iraq%20withdrawal&amp;amp;st=cse"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/world/middleeast/13iraq.html?scp=1&amp;amp;sq=iraq%20withdrawal&amp;amp;st=cse" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/world/middleeast/13iraq.html?scp=1&amp;amp;sq=iraq%20withdrawal&amp;amp;st=cse"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems like the Iraqis are happy with the withdrawal timeline too, I will have to get you that article later.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PBomb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:33:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20072867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;didn't we already have this discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;yes, I consider myself an ally of The President.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;why don't you research our archives. I was talking about Obama and volunteering and supporting him openly before most Black folks had ever heard of him. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rikyrah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20072292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmmmmm...  LOL!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">caligirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:09:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A worthy rant from BooMan on Obama criticism from the Left blogosphere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/a-worthy-rant-from-booman-on-obama-criticism-from-the-left-blogosphere/#comment-20072161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you know he is!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">caligirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>