-
Website
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/ -
Original page
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
RobM
4558 comments · 1373 points
-
D.
4445 comments · 442 points
-
Justice58
8687 comments · 2770 points
-
Sepia
3709 comments · 5265 points
-
spirit_55z
11766 comments · 4355 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Afternoon Open Thread
1 day ago · 110 comments
-
People have asked about Jane Hamsher
14 hours ago · 53 comments
-
Thursday Open Thread
1 day ago · 78 comments
-
Tuesday Open Thread
2 days ago · 104 comments
-
The Senate Passes Their Healthcare Bill
1 hour ago · 1 comment
-
Afternoon Open Thread
She basically said that the Clintons would not want to be vetted.
She really has supported Obama each time I've seen her speak. She is genuine in her support.
Joe Biden just came on stage with Obama. I like how they look together, there's an ease ..similar to what I've seen with Richardson but not with Edwards. I have a good feeling about this choice. It's gonna be great.
She "LET IT [them] GO!!! :>) :>)
has anyone ever went into specifics about those problems..Like you I was an initial Richardson backer.. I just dont want these problems to cloud him when he's sitting in the chair of S.O.S.
:)
"He knows McCain better than anyone else. He intimidates McCain more than anyone else. He can call McCain out better than anyone else on some of his positions," said Biden’s pollster, Celinda Lake, in a recent interview."
You said then:
I've repeatedly seen some pretty innocuous comments met with all kinds of outrage here. Well, looks like Obama is repudiating that brand of racially-based outrage by picking Biden. Maybe that accounts for your bewilderment.
I dunno, maybe it's just because I'm the target demographic that I buy into this pick. But if I didn't think Biden had a good heart, I wouldn't defend him.
Thanks for this post.
But, what do I know...I was crazy enough to have wanted Richardson for the longest, then Webb, then the Governor Cowboy.
BWA HA HA HA HA HA
Some spoilsport leaked the info to CNN and ruined it though.
Here, there and everywhere. I'm curious as to who everyone thought would be best. I don't care how much Obama speaks of change, you have to do so within the reality of American politics. Exactly who is the best VP choice?
I believe an Obama presidency is our best chance to getting on track for better opportunity in America.
...And in Biden, we have a textbook example of the difference between holding racist ideations (his "clean and articulate" comments about Obama, his stereotypical remarks about Indian-Americans and convenience stores, etc.) and "race baiting" (the Clintonian and Republican penchant for willfully using the wedge of race to divide Americans in order to win elections). Biden is surely guilty of the former but, let's be honest, who isn't? You? Go to the mirror and think again! Watching Biden over the decades, I've not seen him willfully use race to divide others (which is what has placed so many of us in an unforgiving stance toward Bill Clinton, especially this past year). Even when they were still primary rivals for the nomination, Obama came to Biden's defense during a debate, defending that "in his soul," Biden's not a hater...
I like Giordano, but don't follow him regularly (damned work & real life, and the distractions they bring!). Just from this post, it appears Giordano would have preferred a non-insider, but he's apparently reconciled to Biden being the best choice from the short list of DC insiders, and IMHO, he lays out a pretty good case for his opinion.
I love it, I love it, I love it . . .
Did Lieberman and Edwards not prove that picking someone from a much sought after demographic means nothing if voters don't connect with them. Lieberman couldn't help carry what is effectively Jewish state, Florida, and Edwards not only didn't care the South, he couldn't even carry his on state of North Carolina. What Team Obama has to do is figure out how to make the POW and Maverick appeal unappealing. George Bush damn sure figured it out. As a matter of fact, ALL southern states in 2000, which are more pro-military than any other region in the country, picked a draft dodger over a POW. If Conservatives weren't persuaded that McCain is owed the presidency because he was a POW, why should the rest of the country, specifically Democrats?
About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like 'Jewish Floridians,' and 'southern white men,' aren't on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they're more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won't have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.
About McCain's POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their 'housing' media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain's POW cred.
Finally, I personally think Biden isn't an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he's about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.
Can we deal with 2008 right now. I mean I am all about planning for the future that is why I am choosing Obama...but right now Obama/Biden is my choice because of our WTF present!
I am just not about the whole future of "the party" mantra because I've grown extremely tired of the whole Democrat vs Republican battle.
Again, I think I miss your point.
That said, I think your comment is kind of into the weeds. It raises an unrelated issue against my main point without arguing it directly. Again, if you think too few women support female candidates, that's an important question for a different discussion. But my point doesn't really deal with that. And my current preference isn't colored by unwillingness to support other female candidates in the past. I'm a man who's supported women at all levels of elective office.
I said - "Nice shirt!" He said, VERY LOUDLY - "He's the only one to vote for! He's my man!!"
There was a thunderous applause on the bus!!! It was a great moment!!! :>) :>)
I totally agree with the Field's comments because if you get a group of black folk in a room or a group of white folk in a room: things are going to be said that should not be said. we also have to recognize right or wrong earlier generations did not grow up in the blended neighborhoods we now have --- they don't always realize that some things can be offensive.
In comparision to the other things that have been said since then, calling Obama clean and articulate is hardly offensive.
" I think a lot of white people have already found Barack's charitable nature on racial issues to be very refreshing, long before this VP pick. To highlight an instance where Barack Obama was once again able to look past some clumsy (not hateful) racial remarks will only add to that appeal and spread the word to uninformed white people that Barack's not all about making white people the villain in America."
Like it or not, this is the main reason Biden is a good choice. Remember, Obama is playing by the Jackie Robinson rules. Choosing a guy who has said insulting things about blacks is a GOOD thing. It makes him look "not like the others" in the eyes of whites.
And there's a Free Tibet rally going on in my neighborhood right now.
McCain's camp is just trying to get some PRESS. What is crystal clear is that the Obama camp managed to make choosing his VP pick a week long media frenzy which built up to a huge peak, expertly carried out so that the entire day today, its been wall to wall coverage on MSNBC, CNN and Fox. A Saturday, so that all the people that work Mon thru Fri got the full brunt of the excitement. The biggest day of the week for print news is the Sunday paper and Obama and Biden are on EVERY front page tomorrow, and every Sunday talk show will have full VP coverage and then right on schedule, its Monday and time for the convention. Brilliant.
By Monday McCain's camp might be putting out the rumor that Oprah is a potential VP pick for him.
Powell has repeatedly praised Obama's presidential run, and has offered him foreign policy advice. I very much doubt that he would do anything to derail Obama. In fact, Powell has refused to even endorse any candidate.
Whew!! Really out of breath DEEP Breaths!! :>) :>)
Did I miss anything???? JUST KIDDING!!!! :>) :>)
Here's the song - - "Ebony and Ivory" [Stevie Wonder] :>) :>) :>)
So B O has been transformed into O - B and to me this says . . .
DING! DING! DING!! We have a WINNER!!!!
billary WHO???? :>) :>)
http://www.feministing.com/archives/010594.html
Biden's also a long-serving member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which, because it vets and approves Supreme Court nominees, has an incredibly important role in protecting choice. There's good and bad on Biden's record here. He chaired the committee from 1987 to 1995, presiding over the confirmation hearings of Robert Bork (who was rejected) and Clarence Thomas.
Biden's role in the Thomas hearings, particularly his treatment of Anita Hill, are something that get little mention these days. (Although some women remember.) Biden says he did not vociferously pursue Hill's charges of sexual harassment because he didn't want to go after a Supreme Court nominee the way Republicans would. Here's Charles Ogletree, who represented Hill, on why Biden's excuse is bullshit:
OGLETREE: (Senator Biden) doesn't understand that by sitting back and taking no position that he has encouraged the victimization of Anita Hill. She has civil rights and civil liberties, too. She wasn't applying for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. She was not coming forward with an agenda to change the landscape of America.
And so for him to say that he didn't help her because he didn't want to be like the other side, to me, is to acknowledge that he has neglected to do his duties. He was the chairman. He was supposed to ask tough questions. He was supposed to get to the bottom of issues....And the bottom line is that Anita Hill was pilloried from beginning to end without any protection from anybody in that process....
What the senator did regrettably was to bend over in the wrong direction, and I think he did a great disservice in the sense of civil rights by being so tolerant of the lack of responsiveness on the part of one party and being so intolerant of efforts on the other side to bring out issues that may have shed light on (Thomas' character).
Some believe that thanks to Joe Biden, and his refusal to let those testify who confirmed Anita Hill's allegations, we now have Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.
besides i am putting trust in Mr latino who will out number both the whites and blacks and you know what-I would rather have them taking my last bit of cash than your obama