<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Jack and Jill Politics - Latest Comments in Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/</link><description>A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:22:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-1492103</link><description>Change for many, not just a few.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msmartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-1490570</link><description>In light of the fact that the Republican party has appointed more blacks to cabinet positions than Clinto did, 98 % of the black community will not vote for McCain,a white candidate, with a black candidate running against him.\&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.Is this racist?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.If not, what  changes does the black community expect  when he is elected ?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jocko</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-961556</link><description>At this point....my God...is John McCain walking around with a "Kick Me" sign on his back? For real, if the MSM really highlighted the relevant happenings around these two camps as they should....I think it would actually work to McCain's advantage because it would actually look like they were picking on a little old man...even though it would just be accurate reporting. I mean....McCain's campaign right now is better left to its own devices..they are literally too easy of a mark. I didn't see that before...I do now.  Just look at the happenings in the last 48 hours...wow.....watching the goof-up on Good Morning America today, I just teared up for McCain...it was that bad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lynne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-960454</link><description>msmartin:  AMEN - BIG TIME!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenLadyHere</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-959397</link><description>If it helps, I understood where you were going....... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coby_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:49:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-959359</link><description>Thanks for the apology, D. I am sometimes not really good at articulating things about whose reality we're centering, though I almost always feel it really strongly (though not in words) and feel a sort of wrongness when something is off. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty limited, on this one, though -- I don't know how much I can contribute to a discussion of this ...  I too easily get disoriented and already don't express things very clearly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But again, I appreciate your comment and apology.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-959211</link><description>Then &lt;b&gt;that's&lt;/b&gt; a different discussion, and I'll apologize for my snarkiness. Working on trying to act civilized.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coby_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-959139</link><description>I missed that piece, D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I stand by what I am saying, though ... there is something off in looking at this from such a US-is-the-center-of-reality perspective when we are actually talking about someone else's country. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I don't think I am very good at saying this clearly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you are playing games with words in your response and it is ugly to me. Actual dialogue - not possible here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:28:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-959059</link><description>....which was a reply to Ronnie saying that Maliki said he was misquoted/taken out of context. He wasn't; he knew what he was saying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, do tell....where does your comment fit in? Looking through my lens, I'm not really sure....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coby_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:20:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-958979</link><description>That was a reply to D's comment starting with "Bullshit, Iraq:"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:12:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-958961</link><description>Iraq is an actual country where actual real human beings actually LIVE. It is occupied by the U.S military.  This is actual lived reality for people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking through this lens, your concerns seem shallow and self-absorbed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-958333</link><description>not just you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rikyrah</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-958113</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnym.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;NYT REJECTS MCCAIN'S EDITORIAL; SHOULD 'MIRROR' OBAMA&lt;/a&gt; More media bias, and once again…in Obama’s favor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karmi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-957326</link><description>rikyrah:  GREAT POST - as usual!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenLadyHere</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-957308</link><description>msmartin:  YEP!  I did suggest, on another post, that we could communicate our displeasure[O.K., anger] to Black commentators, e.g., Mr. Roland Martin, etc. who appear on some MSM programs.  Let them "carry the message".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenLadyHere</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-957260</link><description>Sepia:  My suggestion:  Continue our communications with Black media and make this a CENTRAL POINT.  For example - Mr. Roland Martin, ? Robinson, etc.  appear on various cable media.  They could "take the message".  Just a thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenLadyHere</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-957063</link><description>So, question: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the point to.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. highlight that Obama's timetable was "endorsed" by the Iraqis, or&lt;br&gt;2. to "destroy" McCain for not accepting a timetable?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep in mind that both candidates have said that we will have to draw down from Iraq.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coby_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-957035</link><description>I'm not sure he really has to "earn" this one. The damage is already done, just at the mention of the story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if all that was said was "Maliki suggests 16-month timetable for withdrawal of US troops," you could easily draw the connection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's really not much for the MSM to say. It is what it is. Maliki can't really walk back from it-especially since Obama was mentioned by name.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coby_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:08:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-956980</link><description>Did anyone read how they changed their position to the interpreter "mistranslated" the Prime minister's remarks after they received a call from the Administration?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TRW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-956948</link><description>Not if the media ignores this (which they've been doing).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember all the accusations of Obama "flip-flopping" on Iraq?  Well, when presented with a story that clearly relates to Obama's Iraq policy on troop withdrawal--and what's more relevant than the Iraqi leader's position on troop withdrawal?--the same media can't be bothered anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The media isn't covering this, PRECISELY because it's a gimme for Barack.   They're acting as if he hasn't "earned" the coverage.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonnieB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:00:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-956854</link><description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080720/ap_en_tv/ap_on_tv_obama_s_trip" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Is media playing fair in campaign coverage?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;i&gt;.. The anchor blessing defines the trip as a Major Event and — much like a "Saturday Night Live" skit in February that depicted a press corps fawning over Obama — &lt;b&gt;raises anew the issue of fairness in campaign coverage&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/i&gt; MSM is &lt;i&gt;‘In-the-Tank’&lt;/i&gt; for Obama. They put out stories favoring him, even if not true or a mistranslation, etc. “Biased”? Yes, most certainly, and that bias favors Obama.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karmi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-956820</link><description>Well, in that &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/21/mccain-owns-first-foreign_n_114013.html rel="nofollow"&gt;very same interview&lt;/a href&gt; he said Iraq/Pakistan border. Only thing....they don't share the same border. Afghanistan and Pakistan do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Texas_Girl_in_LA</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:47:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-956777</link><description>To quote PE&lt;br&gt;"Can't Trust em'"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noelani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-955995</link><description>This has nothing to do with Iraq, but is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the press is not calling Obama the "presumptive Democratic nominee" anymore, they're calling him the "likely Democratic nominee?"  What's up with that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Town</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:34:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Doubt MSM Bias? This Maliki Statement Should Settle That</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/do-you-doubt-msm-bias-this-maliki-statement-should-settle-that/#comment-955568</link><description>Great post rikyrah! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What can we do to call out the MSM for their bias and force them to report these stories?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sepia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:44:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>