DISQUS

Jack and Jill Politics: Even Obama Snowed By McCain "Cred"

  • Craig Hickman · 1 year ago
    Okay, a sunshine-y, hope-y perspective about this. (I can't help myself.)


    Maybe this is why Wright is going public now. No way will Obama's opponents let this be, so if Wright can show up in interviews and appear calm and intelligent and human and not some insane, deranged, wackadoodle....



    See where I'm going?



    As for McCain's "cred", he's not fooling me. I don't think he's fooling Obama either, but Obama isn't going to take McCain to task for this because it would fall into his category of distraction.
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    dnA,


    Come on, my brother. What is Obama supposed to say?



    " Naw, I don't believe McCain."



    What he really wants to say is..



    " Ain't this a bitch? Even if it's only words, at least McCain is sayind the right words. Hillary ain't said SHIT about the ad."



    That's what he WANTS to say.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    I don't think Obama believes McCain one bit. Deep down, he knows McCain is behind this just like he knew Hillary was behind the cocaine and Mudrassa attacks despite her denials.


    The thing is that unless he has evidence that show McCain is behind this, he can't accuse him. It's a Black man's word against a white male "war hero's" word. Who do you think the public will believe.



    I can just imagine the media reaction if Obama said he believe McCain's denials are bogus: "How dare he not believe a former P.O.W.!" "If it weren't for McCain's sacrifices, Obama wouldn't be where he is today".



    This is where is surrogates come in. They can come forward and plant doubt in the minds of the voters by saying something like, "Well, it says alot that the presumptive GOP nominee can't persuade his fellow party members. If he doesn't have influence over fellow party members, how can he cross part lines to get things done in Washington?"



    or.....



    "Well, McCain did seek the nomination of Hagee and he did make that commencment speech at Liberty, so.....".



    or....



    "First, he has Bill Cunningham introduce at a rally. Then his campaign sends a email trying to tie Obama to Hamas, and now this? I sense a PATTERN".
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Craig Hickman,


    The Obama campaign has already taken McCain to task. Here is the quote:



    "The fact that Senator McCain can't get his own party to take down this misleading, personal attack ad raises serious questions about his promise to the American people that he will run a civil, respectful campaign."





    Team McCain responds by saying that Obama has been the one who's failed to condemn attacks on McCain's character and integrity.



    -Micheline
  • D. · 1 year ago
    McCain has no power to pull the ad. Neither does the RNC. The NC GOP is an independent entity.


    The civility is in publically denouncing the ad, which both McCain and the RNC have done.
  • Kat · 1 year ago
    d.,


    McCain has no power to pull the ad? As the Republican nominee?



    The NC GOP must really not have much respect for him.
  • BigAssBelle · 1 year ago
    mccain is utterly without ethics. it's evident in his entire history, even predating his service in congress.


    i have no doubt that he's reveling in the fact of this ad being out there, while officially taking the high road.



    and this is precisely his plan for now. he's out of money, so he's on every talk show, making little news items, helped along by his ass sucking fawning toadies in the press.



    this is perfect for him. he gets to look like the good guy ~ because no one could imagine that St. John McCain could do what was done to him in 2000 ~ while benefiting from the fact of the ad.



    it's even better, because now he publicly denounces it and looks like such an ethical candidate, but i am 100% certain that he's thrilled.



    john mccain is scum. he's dangerous. god help us if he wins.
  • D. · 1 year ago
    Republican nominee doesn't translate into the head of the NC GOP. Or the RNC, for that matter.


    Besides, the ad isn't even about Obama. It's about the two democratice candidates for governor there. If Clinton was in the ad, no one would be complaining that it was unfair.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    McCain is no fool, he will be at a fundraiser from the same churls who put that ad out when they need him. The GOP has been anti-black for more than 40 years, and, everyone nows it and gives them a free pass, so, this ad comes as no suprise, just as his lame attempt to denounce it does not either.




    He is no more a friend of the black community than Hill/Billy or anyone else in the DNC. Its not that hard to see where many of these people stand on race related matters, pander to the Hispanics since they are the major group now, and, for the DNC, they have no fears of blacks leaving, since, many will vote for HRC if she steals the nomination. And, this blind allegiance to the DNC is why blacks are still at the bottom of the rung.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Team Obama: Everything That Hurts Us Is a Distraction


    That North Carolina GOP ad? More than 172,000 views since Tuesday, with who knows how many who have now seen it replayed on cable news networks.



    Also revealing is, as Instapundit's reader noted, the response: Jeremiah Wright is ipso facto racially divisive and thus out of bounds for a political ad. So is showing Osama bin Laden, the Obama camp insists in response to a Hillary Clinton ad. So is quoting Obama's statement at the San Francisco fundraiser about "bitter" small town Americans "clinging" and whatnot.



    Stephanopolous asking Obama about Bill Ayers? Out of bounds. Asking him about why he doesn't wear a flag pin? Not fair, not permitted, and making the whole debate "something akin to a federal crime" in the eyes of the New Yorker.



    Asking more than eight questions about Tony Rezko? That's just being unreasonable.



    John McCain is already competing for the voters in the center, while Obama and Clinton are still competing for the votes of the party's liberal wing.



    An element of this strategy, by the way, includes McCain sometimes taking shots at his own party, often in ways that will make conservatives grumble. See today's criticism of Bush's handling of Katrina, or his criticism of the North Carolina GOP commercial featuring Jeremiah Wright, or his criticism of Cincinnati talk show host Bill Cunningham for calling Obama by his full name.



    But day by day, a crystal-clear contrast is being drawn between McCain and Obama.



    Liberal radio talk show host Ed Schultz calls John McCain a warmonger at an Obama rally, and the Obama campaign issues a terse statement that he shouldn't be called that term (and oh by the way, our candidate opposed the Iraq war from the start.



    Obama's top surrogate in West Virginia, Senator Jay Rockefeller, insults all fighter pilots and suggests that McCain doesn't care about the lives of people on the ground because he dropped bombs during his wartime service. What's the response?



    “Senator Obama has a deep respect for Senator McCain’s service to this country and doesn’t agree with what Senator Rockefeller said,” said Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki.



    We never see Obama denounce any of these remarks, (heaven forbid he do so in front of a camera like McCain does) or ever call anyone out as inappropriate.



    The DNC chops up McCain's quote, and Obama doesn't object. A liberal group makes a web ad mocking McCain's age, and Obama doesn't object. Jimmy Carter goes overseas to hug Hamas leaders, and Obama says he doesn't approve, but he can't do anything about it.



    One guy says he's going to unite the country, and is running on hope, but when his surrogates try to kneecap an opponent, we get these milquetoast disapproving statements from press aides. But when somebody on McCain's team does something that's even remotely controversial, the senator denounces it in front of the cameras.



    One guy walks the walk, the other guy just talks the talk. And the frustrated independents, exhausted from nasty politics, will notice this.
  • N. Mahana · 1 year ago
    And you come to this blog to state that? I know, you just could NOT resist! Next time practice some self control.
  • Craig Hickman · 1 year ago
    A fool knows the good cop/bad cop game McFraud is playing.


    Independents comprise arguably the most intelligent part of the electorate.
  • JedReport · 1 year ago
    obama is saying: if mccain opposes the ad, it will come down. if it doesn't come down, he doesn't oppose the ad. judge him as he does, not on what he says.
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    ..and if he opposes it and it doesn't come down, he has no power.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    McFraud know what's up. Just as he did with Bill Cunningham,& the first attack ad he released.


    He's such a liar & stupid enough to think he's being slick.
  • jgr4 · 1 year ago
    I think jedreport is exactly right. Obama isn't fooled. He meant precisely what he said, and I think he's right. McCain is the nominee, and if he wanted the ad down, his should have the political clout to make some calls and get it done.


    He expects his audience to be smart enough to come to the obvious conclusion: McCain doesn't mind the ad.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Now McCain says that Wright is fair game. I can't wait for his Catholic-hating Hagee to be an issue. He called the Pope "a whore". This is going to be good. McCain has still not answered questions about this guy, he just keeps pretending that he does not exist, but he will not say why he sought his endorsement and why he still keeps it.