<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jack and Jill Politics - Latest Comments in False Advertising With the First Lady Doll?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/</link><description>A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics</description><atom:link href="https://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/false_advertising_with_the_first_lady_doll/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:49:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: False Advertising With the First Lady Doll?</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/false-advertising-with-the-first-lady-doll/#comment-550053150</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I think you should see an Optometrist..  Immediately!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jane Dough</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Advertising With the First Lady Doll?</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/false-advertising-with-the-first-lady-doll/#comment-22432721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What can be done about this or is this a final sale. I'm awfully glad I waited.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Advertising With the First Lady Doll?</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/false-advertising-with-the-first-lady-doll/#comment-22145035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dolls like that are always a little weird.  Michelle is beautiful...the doll, no so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CaliCat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Advertising With the First Lady Doll?</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/false-advertising-with-the-first-lady-doll/#comment-22127762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The dress is a close approximation of the the inauguration gown, however everything else completely misses the mark.  It was like they just slapped this together threw Michelle's name on it and expected to make a fortune from people looking for something tangible to celebrate the first African American FLOTUS. Shame on them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">womanistmusings</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:29:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>