DISQUS

Jack and Jill Politics: Hillary Clinton on Meet the Press — Aftermath and Impressions

  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    "I might vote for her without much enthusiasm, but I would certainly choose her."


    Isn't that what she's counting on with these tactics? As mad as you get now, she knows you're going to be there for her come November.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    How absurd is it that the Clinton campaign is succeeding at making it sound as if Obama is using the race card. The campaign barely mentioned any of this, and Obama certainly never did, and yet Clinton surrogates keep repeating it until, unfortunately, white independents will believe that's what happened.
    Despicable.

    I have the luxury to live in California but I, for one, would not cast my vote for Clinton. Hopefully, I won't cast my vote for her because Barack will be the one on the ballot but in any case, I am digusted.
  • The Christian Progressive Libe · 1 year ago
    If you want to look for a businessman that is a hero to blacks, I give you: Magic Johnson.


    I'm sorry, Jill, but Magic Johnson can no longer wear that label, either, seeing as he was the first brotha to turn Handkerchief Head and be rented by the Borg Queen.



    I wrote about it here: http://www.getridofthedlc.blogspot.com</br>
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    WOW! Does this compare in any way to "Battered Spouse Syndrome?" It is unfortunate but if you decide to vote for Hillary in the general election, you are voting for the status quo, and actally endorsing her tactics! What is the definition of insanity? "Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." Aren't you tired of being used and taken for granted?
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Obama's been thrown under the bus by Al Sharpton and Hillary will pass you by on the side of the road on her way to rally the Hispanic vote.


    "The Rev. Al Sharpton of New York, who has been on the front line of many of the black-Latino battles in New York politics, said the tension would be a problem for Mr. Obama across the country and in New York, which also votes on Feb. 5. He said Mr. Obama would be at a disadvantage because of his choice to be a “race-neutral candidate.”



    “It’s going to be a challenge that he has got to deal with,” Mr. Sharpton said. “There’s a natural history, and we’ve made some progress. But he has not been part of those efforts to make progress.”



    If Obama gets the nomination, Uncle Al is out of a job. If Hillary wins, Latinos will be her 'new best friend' and where will that leave us?
  • The Bag of Health and Politics · 1 year ago
    I take a contrary view. I think Hillary got the lion's share of the blame for this one. One cannot understate the importance of Rep. Clyburn's quote in the New York Times.


    The story played out for a day or two. The media banged Hillary over the head with the King comment, the Bob Johnson comment, the fairy tale comment, the boos in New York City and the like. Yesterday's today show where Michael Eric Dyson essentially said this was happening "because the Clintons feel entitled for to the presidency and don't want to have to work for votes," is an example.



    Then Obama gets to come in and take the high road. He ends the debate. The issue was raised, but never by him. He gets to oppose some of the more traditional members of the black establishment--something he must do if he is to win. He returns to his "transformative" character, while people are left remembering that there's nothing new about the Clintons.



    I understand people are pissed. I am pissed. Everyone should be pissed. But I believe the crass politics of this one played out in Obama's favor. I also believe Hillary backed off because she knew this backfired, and didn't want to do any more damage to her campaign.
  • Nichelle · 1 year ago
    I would absolutely vote for her over whichever fascist fumbling jackass the Republicans select in their primaries. I might vote for her without much enthusiasm, but I would certainly choose her.


    And that's what the Clintons are banking on. That they could racially rough-ride over Obama right in front of us -- over and over and using sneering, paternalistic barbs -- and that African-Americans would come crawling back anyway in the general election.



    I have voted for Hillary Clinton before, but it won't happen again. And I think she can bank on a lot of black folks like me either considering an independent candidate, John McCain (the only remotely palatable Republican) or just sitting this one out. It's not okay with me (the race-baiting) and I will not be rewarding her with my vote.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Jill,


    Are you insane? You'd still vote for this woman after what she did to a black candidate and black voters?

    Do you understand what that does? All that does is make it even more impossible for black candidates to reach the highest office in the land. Because white politicians will then know that they can use race to slaughter their black opponent with zero consequences. Black people, like you, will take it and still go vote for their racist asses. So what if you're holding your nose. When you vote for Hillary if she wins the primary, you give the stamp of approval to racist campaigning. And that hurts candidates of color in the long haul.



    How you can sit there and say you'll still vote for Hillary is just sad to me.



    Black people, yes, as someone said, we are the battered wives of the world. We'll sit and take anything. Talk a lot of shit like Jill, and still take a smack upside the head. And Jill is an informed person. Just think of all the black folks that don't pay attention to this stuff!



    SMDH
  • NMP · 1 year ago
    "Laudable philanthropy"? Do tell! Bob Johnson an infamous interview on CBS said he felt no obligation to the African American Community. In his own words, it said it was as ridiculous as asking his White friends to take responsibility for poor White folks in the Apalachian mountains. If he has sense revearsed and given back to the Community, I would be most interested, because his name never pops up on top givers on philanthropic lists that I've seen.
  • Jill Tubman · 1 year ago
    OK, I hear you. And yes, blacks have been the battered wife of the Democratic party for a few decades now. Candidates come out to churches and barbershops sure, but only around election time. You may not like the way it sounds. But would you really vote for John McCain or Mike Huckabee over Hillary Clinton? I'm not sure I would. I would probably choose her or stay home. And voting is important to me. Maybe if a strong independent ran, I might consider him/her. But I think a lot of African-Americans would make the same calculations as I did. And yes, it's dismaying that in November, if Obama or Edwards don't receive the nomination, we may face being placed in a position between having to vote for a race-baiter and a racist. Or not voting at all.
  • Jill Tubman · 1 year ago
    Also, re: Bob Johnson -- don't get me wrong. I loathe the man. But the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation is sizable and well-known. And Magic Johnson whose thoughts I would consider long before I listened to anything


    Unlike Bob, Magic has chosen to invest in underserved communities and has been a consistent spokesperson for HIV and AIDS prevention and treatment. I have a lot of respect for him.
  • andy · 1 year ago
    dear jack and jill thanks for the great coverage of this story. race and gender are obviously at the center of this primary. the lbj quote is telling because she identifies herself not by gender but by race with lbj. race is still the great divide. one of the many reasons i love barack is he bridges that divide. the lbj quote is telling because she identifies herself with the ultimate washington powerbroker. the lbj quote is telling because she identifies herself with a president who pulled the trigger on the genocide known as the vietnam war. she has no moral barometer and she is sloppy. i don't see how the abbreviation of this quote alters it's essential stupidity.
  • Blkberi · 1 year ago
    "But if she wins the nomination, I would absolutely vote for her over whichever fascist fumbling jackass the Republicans select in their primaries. I might vote for her without much enthusiasm, but I would certainly choose her.


    And that's what the Clintons are banking on. That they could racially rough-ride over Obama right in front of us -- over and over and using sneering, paternalistic barbs -- and that African-Americans would come crawling back anyway in the general election."



    But if we know that's what they're doing, why concede and vote for her anyway? We do have another option: Cynthia McKinney on the Green Party ticket. Voting for her may not help her (McKinney) win but it'll send a clear message to Clinton and other Dems that they can't play us cheap.



    And Imma need for ol' Charlie to have a cup of hush with his adulterous ass. We wrote about his cheating on Alma last year:



    http://spilledtea.com/spilledteablog/?p=170
  • Webb · 1 year ago
    Choose Hillary or Stay Home? Stay Home.


    A good question for us all would be (in light of the events up to now):

    If Hillary wins the nom and offers Obama the Vice-Presidency, should he accept it?



    Would the vice-presidency be enough to compensate for all of these racist tactics? I don't know about you all, but I don't come THAT CHEAP. I am done voting for Clintons...will never vote for another Clinton again...even if Obama is on the ticket.



    It needs to be telegraphed to the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic Party Establishment...your "most loyal base" of support--the African-American Community--will dismiss you in this next election.



    It's really sad...the way this story is playing out must be Karl Rove's wet dream...



    But at stake is something greater than the Karl Roves, the Republicans or their policies that decimate the African-American community...it is OUR OWN SENSE of SELF-RESPECT at stake.



    The Democratic Party be damned if it tolerates these tactics. The Clinton commentary on MLK, LBJ and Fairytale candidacies is not only disrepectful to Barack Obama. IT IS DISREPECTFUL TO ALL AFRICAN AMERICANS (PAST, PRESENT, & FUTURE).



    And any African American (Robert Johnson, Rangel, Stephanie Tubb-Jones, Sheila Jackson Lee, and even John Lewis, etc.) who defends the Clinton commentary, deserve the infamy which they will receive. IT IS NOTHING LESS THAN UNCLE TOM DEFENDING MASSA....AT ITS BEST.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Jill,


    Voting for Hillary would just embolden this kind of campaigning in the future. If blacks vote for her in our regular numbers, this thing continues for all eternity and there won't ever be a black president, period. Or a latino president or an Asian president,etc. You don't have to vote for Hillary or Republican.Claiming that is the only option is simply a lie and you know that. You can write in a candidate. You can vote Green. You can vote Independent, Libertarian, etc. It's not either/or.



    You say yourself that you know the Clintons are counting on their pickininnies to come running back, yet you turn around and say you will be coming back. What kind of sense does that make.



    Black people really need to get over this downtrodden defeatist attitude that you display. Are you really down or just pretending? Sounds to me like you're a pretender. A phony version of an informed black progressive who'll vote for a race baiter cause you're worrying about "winning" over your own dignity.



    And that is what this comes down to. What exactly is Hillary going to do that will benefit black folk, or hell, the country. She's not going to do shit for us, she's going to stay the course in Iraq, and she'll be so hated that nothing will get done. For more years of same old same old politics. You're willing to vote for that over black dignity. Girl, please. You sound like everything that's wrong with black folks. Talk a good game and don't do shit about it.
  • ronnie b. · 1 year ago
    How absurd is it that the Clinton campaign is succeeding at making it sound as if Obama is using the race card. The campaign barely mentioned any of this, and Obama certainly never did, and yet Clinton surrogates keep repeating it until, unfortunately, white independents will believe that's what happened.
    Despicable.



    And that's exactly what's happening in the minds of white and other non-Black prospective voters. The race card has been played; the would-never voters now have their plausible excuse; the white and non-Black swing voters will be turned off; and Obama inexplicably (but by design) catches the blame.
  • Seaberry · 1 year ago
    I'm an American, and proud of it...
    (BTW, found this Blog through POLITICO, and have enjoyed reading the input here; however, it does have a tad too much focus on - Black...White...Black...White...Black...White, IMO. Still, in the context of the Clinton attacks on Obama, and in general, the Modus Operandi of the Democrat Party, such should be expected. With that said, it's still an A+ Blog, and I have it placed right next to my other favorite Blogs.)



    Jill wrote:

    "But if she wins the nomination, I would absolutely vote for her over whichever fascist fumbling jackass the Republicans select in their primaries."



    Actually, since the Democrat Party promotes Socialism (which is "One Step from Communism"), it is much closer to being a Fascist Party than the Republican Party is. Socialism, Communism, and Fascism are 'Three-Peas-in-the-same-Pod', i.e. they want to abolish individualism and replace it with a "folk community" (the State)...so to speak.



    INDIVIDUALISM
  • QueenBeeh · 1 year ago
    Enough… I will not vote for Hillary Clinton either in the primary or the national should she get the nomination. They count on us being the step-n-fetch-it crowd that will just say yessur boss and fall in line behind them. To say that we as black folks have no where to go is ridiculous. We can write in a candidate, vote Republican, vote Independent, vote on only the down ticket races, or exercise our options and just stay home. It is high time that we take a stand and stop enabling the Clintons or anyone else using racial tactics against viable minority candidates.


    For all of the ranting and railing I’ve heard against the Iraq war from minorities and women, how can anyone support the war mongering Hillary with a clear conscious? The Democrats so reflexively believe that any Democrat is better than anything from the other side that we will fall in line no matter which constituency has to be thrown under the bus to restore the Clintons to the White House.
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    I can say without equivocation, that I will NEVER vote for Hillary Clinton.


    Doesn't matter to me who the GOP candidate is.



    Jill, someone on FN pointed this out:



    This isn't just an attack on Obama. This is an attack on ANY Black candidate that dares to aspire to higher office in the future. And, if we, the Black community, turns around and gives THAT WOMAN our votes, after she has participated and orchestrated this race-baiting, then WE will be complicit in setting in cement a CEILING for Black political candidates.



    Because, they will have the playbook from the Clintons.



    No. There comes a time when you must stand up. There comes a time when you must do what's right for not only now, but future possibilities.



    Letting Hillary Clinton get away with this bullshit is not an option. EVER voting for her is NOT an option.



    So what if the GOP wins..it's not like Black folk don't already know hard times. But, to let that race-baiting heifer get away with this?



    HELL NO.



    I shall not go sit in the corner and KNOW MY PLACE. Fuck that, and all her Handkerchief Heads.
  • Yvette · 1 year ago
    Please note: the Bob Johnson of BET fame is NOT the same man as the Robert (Wood) Johnson of the health care foundation fame. It seems that some may have been under that impression. (If not, my apologies!)


    Great election coverage, BTW. I look forward to reading more!
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Anonymous,


    I was disagreeing with Jill. I was not attacking her personally, and I won't sit around while any of the Bloggers are attacked here.
  • phillygirl · 1 year ago
    As one who'd probably rather vote for a fascist fumbling jackass than a scheming scumbag, I'm not too displeased to see the media shrieking about race. This may obscure for the Clintons what their bigger problem is: where are white liberals and independents going to go in November? I'm a pretty keen judge of white liberals, having been one all my life, and if Clinton wins the nomination they (we) face a big problem: their candidate, they have now seen, is not Nice. Many well-meaning white Dems, having trod a rather soft path in life, place tremendous value on Nice. Al Gore and John Kerry, whatever their shortcomings, represented the forces of Nice against the Rovian menace. But suppose the situation is reversed and Hillary is facing, in John McCain, an opponent who's actually, arguably a decent human being.


    So let the Clintons flail and grope for a white backlash. I don't know where it's going to come from, in either the primaries or the general. The cracker vote has long since decamped to the Republican side. And the longer the Clintons smear Obama, the more white liberals and independents they offend.



    I hope I don't have to take this all back when we're deep into the administration of a fascist fumbling jackass.
  • The Bag of Health and Politics · 1 year ago
    If Obama doesn't win the nomination, he shouldn't accept the VP nomination. Clinton will lose without him on the ticket, and he'll be the nominee in waiting after that.


    That said, he would be in the position to make a deal, but one that benefits him: one-term and I run with you. That would be one worth considering, but it's also risky. If Clinton screws things up and is unpopular in 4 years, he'll have a hard time winning. That's why I think he should say no to the VP nomination.
  • SquarePeg · 1 year ago
    Seaberry,


    Please go back to the Ron Paul web page. You asked why the focus on Black, White, Black White. Hellooo.



    That is what the discussion is about, and if you didn't know it. This is a black blog with a black perspective.



    Too many people died for us to be able to vote so IF Hillary were THE candidate, I would vote for her, otherwise we play into the hands of many of these people try to persuade us to stay home.



    One way or the other we have to make the decision for our future and our children's futures. Its not all about us but them and I mean ALL of our children. Whether we like it or not, we do have a choice and for me it could never be the selfish, mean-spirited, racist Republicans.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Squarepeg,


    Barak Obama represents a change from the status quo. The status quo is Hillary and...you.
  • ronnie b. · 1 year ago
    If Obama doesn't win the nomination, he shouldn't accept the VP nomination. Clinton will lose without him on the ticket, and he'll be the nominee in waiting after that.


    If -- if -- Obama does not get the nomination, I think he may be hard pressed to accept a VP offer from Clinton; he would be effectively endorsing the very politics that he's campaigning against.



    But with each passing day, and with more and more people discovering what the Clintons are all about, he'll win the nomination.
  • scooter · 1 year ago
    from what I read about Bob Johnson, I wonder what he's doing hanging out with a supposed liberal, and what the supposed liberal is doing hanging out with Bob Johnson.


    But then, this is the campaign that hired Mark Penn, CEO of Burson-Marsteller.



    I wasn't ever going to vote for Clinton. It's just getting too much like royalty to have it all in the family all of the time. She sure is making it easier not to vote for her.



    I'll vote green or take a hard look at Bloomberg. My bet is he jumps in if Clinton gets the nomination. Way out here on the left coast I don't know much about the mayor of New York City.
  • natthedem · 1 year ago
    If Hillary Clinton somehow race baits her way to the Democratic nomination, my plan of action is as follows:


    1. Change my party affiliation

    2. Get a new URL for my website

    3. Join this effort
  • Nedsdag · 1 year ago
    Hillary Clinton has to EARN my vote, but in the past few weeks I have seen nothing to change my mind or my support for Obama. Is Obama perfect? Hell, no, but he's not the two faced schemer Mrs. Clinton has shown herself to be.


    Having house negroes like Stephanie Tubbs Jones and Charlie Rangel go after Obama is making the situation worse. The Clintons both pandered for the black vote and taken it for granted as well. Not even "black brotha" Bill's K-Fed impersonation will bring me over to their side.
  • Bill · 1 year ago
    Re Robert Johnson, she doesn't care what the black community might think of him; that isn't why she is using him. She is playing to whites here. They don't know who the f*ck he is. They just know some powerful black guy is slamming Obama. Then they see a bunch of "angry Negroes" on TV debating race and coke use. This is exactly what Hillary wants. It doesn't matter what they say. It is the imagery she is banking on. Race card 101. This doesn't make the Hillary camp "racist," just shameless and no better than the GOP.


    I wouldn't vote for Hillary if she were the last Democrat on earth.
  • Ibn Warraq · 1 year ago
    I'm not black, but I'm an Iranian-American and would love to see this country have it's first non-white candidate, and right now I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton after the crap she's pulled unless she makes Obama her VP.


    In fact I would go on to say all fair-minded people, regardless of their race or religion should refuse to vote for Hillary after the kind of campaign she's run.



    Beyond that, while I'm not a Republican, what would be so horrible about either McCain or Huckabee. I'm not a fan of Huckabee's politics or the his talk about changing the Constitution to fit God's standards(my parents came to the US to get away from that kind of thinking) but in his last election to Governor, he got 40% of the black vote, so clearly a lot of black people are familiar with him and don't have a problem with him.



    I certainly find him preferable to either Giuliani or Romney both of whom seem to support torture and expanding the curtailment of our civil liberties.
  • baltogeek · 1 year ago
    There is no way in hell I will be voting for Hillary.


    My objection before was political. She and her husband have always been too quick to adopt GOP strategies and ideas when it suited them politically.



    And as an African-American, between Ricky Ray Rector, Sister Soulja, welfare reform and all the other bullshit they've pulled on our community there was no way in good conscience I could vote for her.



    She's essentially a Republican. A moderate Republican perhaps but a typical Republican who is perfectly happy running over any black or brown person to get more votes.



    (Wait till the western states open up you know she's going to try to stir up a fight between blacks and Latinos)



    This new shit has just made me angrier. I don't care who the Republicans are running in the general election, I'll vote for the Dems in the local and state elections and for president if that two-faced liar is the nominee I'm writing in Shirley Chisolm's name a real feminist and a real fighter for change.



    Fuck Hillary and Bill.
  • terriblist · 1 year ago
    Individualism: "Socialism, Communism, and Fascism are 'Three-Peas-in-the-same-Pod'.."


    Good boy, you've done the required Party Reading for the day, Mr. Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism." A loyal Comrade like you will rise HIGH in the Party.



    You successfully painted the traitorous Democratic Party with a sufficiently broad brush to connect it to both Stalin and Hitler, two mortal enemies from the Last Great War. Truly a rhetorical and logical feat. Thank you Comrade.



    -Herr Rove
  • bill · 1 year ago
    seaberry: 'they want to abolish individualism and replace it with a "folk community"'


    This is why I'm against football and other collectivist sports. These sports diminish the individual and brainwash people into supporting collectives, universal health care, and the obvious next step: Nazi death camps for minorities and liberals. Oh, wait, the minorities and liberals are Nazis...or something... Anyways, I only play golf. Football, baseball, and basketball (tennis is iffy) promote socialism, which as we all know, is fascism. Black is also white. And up is down.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    Ryan Lizza has an essay in the New Yorker. At the end of the piece he writes that the Clintons see that the Latinos are the fastest growing minority and they want to lasso them in to their machine.
    Latinos are nostalgic for the 90s and would love to go back to the future rather than go forward.

    So, the Clintons and their pollsters have made the calculation to basically throw african americans under the bus to get the latinos in their camp.

    So, start a racebaiting thing and not only do they paint Obama as a stereotype that plays into the very tensions between latinos and african amnericans, but, keeps them away and therefore unable to be moved by Obama and his appeal.

    My question is if this is indeed what the Clintons are doing, then it's obviously not a secret. So, why are so many black pols standing by them and willing to destroy their credibility and self respect to go out and lie and attack Sen. Obama? People like Tubbs Jones, Rangel, Jackson Lee, ect.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    I forgot. I was watching Washington Journal this morning on cspan. the question was if Clinton or Obama was playing the race card.
    Mostly whites - especially indies and democrats, called in.

    I'd say about 90%+ said this was Hillary and her surrogates doing it to take down Obama.

    So, it seems alot of whites have already figured out the game and know what Hillary is up to and they are not buying it.

    Seems the only people who are are the people already supporting Hillary. And even among supporters, she's lost a few judging from comments on other sites.

    Most say they will not vote for her if she is the nominee.

    Thought you might like to know that Hillary's plan to drive away white indies backfired and stuck to her and not Obama
  • ceedub · 1 year ago
    I'm glad to hear that many folks see through the Clintons' BS scheme. I think this incident reminds people of all the stuff they couldn't stand about the Clintons--the drama, the scandals, etc. Who wants to go back to that?


    Love the blog, BTW.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    As for voting for HRC in the general election, there is no way. I did not vote for her husband in '92 or '96 for pretty much the same nonsense and ended up voting third party. It was the best thing I ever did, and I have no voter's remorse.


    More people need to vote for what they believe and not what the media or lame surrogates tell them what to believe. If more people threw off their votes to parties like the Greens (say 5%-15% of voters), the Democratic party would definitely take notice, especially since elections have been so close lately. Until then, some in the Democratic Party will continue to take your vote for granted while they insult you to your face. You never saw George W. Bush insult the evangelicals, even though he may have taken them for granted.



    The Clinton campaign over the last month has been, at best, disgraceful. There are plenty of other reasons not to vote for Hillary Clinton, in addition to the lastest round of racebaiting. They do not deserve anyone's vote (African-Americans, Latinos, Labor et al) for that matter.



    I was prepared to vote for the any of the Democratic candidates until a month ago. If HRC wins the primary, she will definitely not get my vote. It is time to throw her entitled butt under the bus and let her see what it feels like. Let her kiss the "restoration" goodbye. If they lose over this, I guarantee the Democratic party will see to it that this nonsense does not happen again.
  • The Ink · 1 year ago
    The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation was established by the family that currently owns the NY Jets of the NFL and was the president of Johnson and Johnson.


    as for Magic Johnson, he has already stuck his foot in his mouth regarding Barack Obama...



    http://inkognegro.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/magic-johnson-and-a-live-microphone-a-match-made-in-heaven/
  • The Bag of Health and Politics · 1 year ago
    Hillary 53
    None of the Above 40



    None of the Above WINS Detroit and Flint, the major urban areas of Michigan. Hillary wins on suburban white women.



    From Exit Polling. Among African Americans



    None of the Above 73

    Hillary 25



    Tell me how you can win Michigan when 40% of voters went out on a snowy day just to vote AGAINST you. Hillary has major problems. She is unelectable. People are starting to realize that. Obama needs to win Nevada--a tough thing for him to do. If he can, then the wheels start to fall off of Hillary's bus again.
  • Anonymous · 1 year ago
    I loved this post and hope very much that people are seeing through Hillary's dishonesty.


    One thing, though; the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1991, during the first Bush Administration, and the Family and Medical Leave Act was passed the same year. The Clinton administration was competent, barely, and I was proud to have voted for him twice, but without a Democratic Congress, he spent 6 years playing defense. And since he was responsible for losing congress...



    Barack Obama can get us a landslide, a landslide that can move the country beyond whatever micro-proposals either Obama or Clinton feel obliged to put out during the campaign. Clinton will just piss people off, and we'll spend the next 8 years trying to get a $23 tax credit for new shoelaces passed and she'll try to tell us that its the second coming of the new deal. No thanks.
  • jstele · 1 year ago
    When Hillary made that comment about Martin Luther King and Lyndon Johnson, she was really comparing Obama to MLK and herself to Johnson. Obama represents hope as did MLK. This was her subtle way of saying that he represents hope, but she is the one who will get the job done. His hope is empty while her leadership is what will make the necessary changes.


    What's interesting is that not only is it a comparison based on perceived leadership, but also race. She did diminish King's leadership and his contributions to civil rights through her comment. Her comments afterwards were pure damage control.