DISQUS

Jack and Jill Politics: Is Obama the End of Black Politics? - Asks NY Times

  • soulsistah02 · 1 year ago
    I find it quite unsettling that not one of the interview subjects were Black female politicians. If the subject of this article was the emergence of a new Black politics that isn't mired in identity politics, but rather embraces collaboration and inclusion, then I think the author has grossly misinterpreted the very subject of his article. I cannot see a "new" politics that excludes sex from the discourse. Am I only the person that feels this way?
  • glory · 1 year ago
    I hear you - a couple of us have noticed the absence of black female politicians in the article. Thank goodness for Cheryl's input, but ah... that was about it. But you can't put Booker's black female counterparts in the article if you don't see any around. Perhaps the author didn't know who to go to? I personally don't know who he should have gone to, but it's a good question. Does anyone know?
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    You are not alone, sister! I think the brothers who were interviewed should have insisted that some black women be interviewed, too. How could Donna Edwards, for example, have been overlooked?
  • Town · 1 year ago
    Well, I think that the MSM , Billary Inc. and the Hannity types would love for Obama to be the end of black politics, but IMO he's only just the beginning. Win or lose, he's squeezed the toothpaste out of the tube and it can't be put back in. Who's to say that in 20 years "Juan Reyes" or "Emily Kim" or "Hardeep Singh" won't run for President one day? I think the Pat Buchanan types know that's going to happen...for all their hyping of Bobby Jindal they know damn well they don't want no Indian a step away from the White House.

    Stopping Obama also stops Reyes, Kim and Singh from thinking they can run for the White House as well. We've already got little black kids looking at this thinking, well maybe I can be President too. And I think that's very disturbing to the Hannitys and Hasselbecks of the world.
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Town,

    as usual, you speak the truth.

    THEY understand it.
    THEY get what an Obama victory would mean.
    THEY get it.

    They get that next time, the platitudes about Jindal (if he survives Louisiana without being indicted IS the Senate and maybe the White House)
    That maybe Richardson has too many 'women rumors', but there's a young Latino out there who doesn't have those problems.

    It's also about the future. I know, sometimes it gets hokey, talking about the ' symbolism' of Obama, but I can't help but think about what this would mean, not only to little Black kids, but to little kids, period. Of growing up in a world where the President of the United States is a Black Man.

    I read diaries, posted by parents of kids who go nuts over Obama. Who see video of his speech in Berlin, and then try and re-create it in their playrooms using their toys and stuffed animals, and think nothing of it. I believe that means something. Something that won't pay dividende for years, but it will pay dividends.
  • Bronze Trinity · 1 year ago
    So true Rikyrah. I think that as long ans Obama wins and doesn't screw up as much as Bush did then he will change the way the world views Black people. His mere existence as President will change the thinking of a lot of Black people about themselves and the world will think differently about us.

    Yes, some people may believe there is no racism or discrimination anymore but its crazy to not want the man to win just to prove racism exists! I have actually heard comments by people worrying that him winning would be bad for Black people. So should we never be CEOs, Principals, or top executives because then people will say discrimination doesn't exist? I thought the goal was to give everyone the opportunity to get to the top. It seems like some people want us to only get so far so that the disparities remain so we can complain about them.

    I'm hoping that although some people will start thinking racism and discrimination don't exist anymore others start thinking Black people are just as good as anyone else so there is no need to be racist or discriminate against them. Hopefully it will even out and the benefits will outweigh the negatives.
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    So when do we begin to see the end of Hispanic, Jewish, Asian, Gay and Native American (I know I missed several groups.) politics?
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    PTCruiser: See how folks get into trouble posing questions about Blacks only??
    "When Will They Ever Learn?" [yes a 70's olde -Where Have All The Flowers Gone?]

    Why do I believe that you don't care? :>) :>) Just kidding! :>) No disrespect. I always think of songs. :>) :>)
  • jonster · 1 year ago
    When a Hispanic, Jewish, Asian, Gay or Native American is running for President?
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    Sharing from black politics on the web:

    http://blackpoliticsontheweb.com/2008/08/06/bla...
    Title: Black Reporters Should Attend Political Conventions

    I agree :>)
  • CPL · 1 year ago
    Rather than Obama being the end of Black Politics, I think his election to the Presidency sets up a new era of Black Politics which do not fit the tradtional standards of the Civil Rights Movement, and that's what has the elder guard scared.

    As in scared they will be left out of the conversation. However, I disagree with the brotha who said "I'm the new Black Politics" because if it weren't for John Lewis and Jim Clyburn being willing to damn near die in the Civil Rights Movement, that brotha's ass wouldn't even be in a position to cry how he's "the new Black Politics." He dissed the Civil Rights vanguard, even though he said he wasn't. While I might not agree with my elders, I was brought up to never disrespect them.

    Jesse, Sr., earns my disdain, but not my disrespect. While I understand Jesse, Jr., disagreeing with his father, I'm going to take the position he defended Obama and decried his father's statements in the heat of the moment. Additionally, Jesse, Sr.'s remarks were ghetto and he should have kept his mouth shut about turning Obama into a eunich.

    It isn't the end of Black Politics - it just changed the rules of the game in terms of how Black politics will be discussed from here on in.
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    CPL,

    Yours and so many others have written great comments here. They are scared because they see that we, this generation, is thru with the ' One Leader' mess. We are finally using ' Black' and "ACCOUNTABLE" in the same sentence - THAT is scary to them, which is why I appreciate the report cards so much. They laughed at you, in the beginning...they're not laughing anymore.
  • msmartin · 1 year ago
    "It isn't the end of Black Politics - it just changed the rules of the game in terms of how Black politics will be discussed from here on in."

    Exactly!
  • 99 Percent Sure · 1 year ago
    I don't even understand the title so I can't read the piece. Why would Obama mark the end of black politics? I don't get it.

    I'm simple like that. Some things just go right over my head. Like this article.
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    99%: Gotta Agree: Way too much gray matter on a title that doesn't make sense - B4 or after reading through the article. Hmmmmm? :>) :>)
  • Inkognegro · 1 year ago
    Good Article...Ridiculous Title.

    You would do better to just act like the Title said "Great Taste, Less Filling"
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    Inkonegro: Thank you. I stand corrected> :>) :>)
  • Miranda · 1 year ago
    I think what Obama has done is is bigger than just changing the game for black politicians....but politics period. He has re-written the book that scares people who are entrenched in DC's games. I remember Donna Brazile screaming the Dems needed to get out of the "red state, blue state" mentality when Kerry was running.....and that's what's happening now. Obama is not relying on just big donors and the power elite to fund his campaign - he reached out to the $25 dollar donor. His rallies and townhall meetings are first come, first serve....excuse me? We aren't screeing every attendee first? Those politicians beholden to traditional DC games are looking in bewilderment...confused...what manner of man is this?

    Obama has already changed the game...I just hope it sticks.
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    Miranda: Big, full-throated AMEN!!! :>)
  • kdizi kdizo · 1 year ago
    Obama represents a new brand/style/model/expression of black politics - not the end of black politics. There are myriad styles/expressions of black politics and black civic engagement. And given the dire state of our present political/social situation, we need as much black political activity and civic engagement as possible - in all its various expressions. I'm particularly interested in those political activities that go beyond voting (national, municipal) - that go beyond the "proper/sanctioned political channels". I definately think that electoral politics/voting is a tactic that we should employ, but it is not the only thing that we should be doing. Voting should not be our political end-all be all. Again, barack represents a new and needed and timely expression of black politics. However, it is going to take more than barack and his political stylo to fix this mess that we are in. It's going to take a concerted effort to get us out of this mess. It's our turn to bring something fresh to the political table.

    Carryn' On

    kdizo
    www.kdizo.wordpress.com
  • Big Man · 1 year ago
    I'm tired of this new meme that young black people don't view the world or politics through the eyes of the civil rights struggle. Which young people are they talking too? Not the ones who come to this site or mine. I still see view the world as a black man first and frankly I'm suspicious of anyone who doesn't.
  • CPL · 1 year ago
    Big Man - CO-SIGN!
  • Inkognegro · 1 year ago
    As usual The big man is on point.

    We view the world as the children of those who were in the struggle.

    It is a decidedly different view than our parents, but it shares a common heritage.

    The struggle you see now is similar to the struggle our parents went through with THEIR parents.

    People always act like the ministers in Montgomery didnt fight Martin tooth and nail.

    What Martin did was unheard of in many respects and the fact that he was young enough to have a different vantage point and base of experience was the critical difference.

    At 47, Obama is the elderstatesman of OUR generation. Old enough to have a sense of the horrors of Vietnam and the immediate post King years and young enough to understand HipHop in its proper context and be able to appreciate the true power of the current technology.
  • glory · 1 year ago
    I liked the article, and I think they would have done better to question the "End of Black Politics" AS WE KNOW IT. It's an interesting question, but not a good one, 'cause the answer seems obvious to me.

    I think Black Politics as-we-know-it will remain with us for as long as we have problems that disproportionately affect our community. But I think that younger black politicians recognize that there are different ways to get stuff done than how the elders have been doing it. New avenues have presented themselves, leaving room to try new ways of being black in public office. I think Obama's candidacy is basically a national scale of something certain places have been seeing in local, young, black politicians. These guys (hmm... no young female officeholders featured here) know how to reach and work with more people in addition to just the black community - I think it can only make them more effective for their constituencies.

    And, I love Michael Nutter and his attitude. Even though he supported Hillary. And he'll get my vote again.
  • Roxie · 1 year ago
    where are the women?
  • CPL · 1 year ago
    I guess young brothas can still be as sexist as the old brothas, Roxie.
  • rmalveaux · 1 year ago
    Obama's political ascendancy is not the end of Black Politics. In fact I would venture to say that Sen. Obama's success is due in large part to his not being a descendant of slaves. Let us not lose sight of the fact that white Americans view him differently than they do the descendants of slaves. Whites' acceptance of Obama is predicated on not having to deal with the unresolved animosities toward the descendants of African slaves by white Americans. With Obama there is not the legacy of antebellum slavery, Jim Crow, or any of the degradations and dehumanizations of the last 400+ years - just racial "progress". The end of Black Politics is just the wishful thinking of those of my countrymen who wish to be proverbial ostriches to the legitimacy and necessity of Black Politics.
    Their support of Obama allows them to say and feel that we have grown past the sceptre of race in American politics and that racial politics no longer has a place in the national discourse. Too many times I have heard politicos say that we do not want to have race as an issue in the Presidential (or any other) race, when , in fact , the ignoring of race has been the glaring flaw of our Constitution and our unwillingness to discuss race in real terms has led us into our Civil War, Jim Crow, the Civil Rights Movement, the Digital Divide and current socio-economic-political inequalities that continue to plague our nation and ruin the lives of our darker countrymen.
    Black politics has served as the moral conscience of American politics, we have always been agents for change. Until we deal with issues of race as an American family, all subsequent conversations and efforts will continue to be flawed and problematic. Because as the descendants of slaves we have known white Americans for a very long time and our knowledge of them is borne out of necessity - the necessity that a slave has to know the ways of the master. The lives of black people have depended on our knowledge of whites, passed down to us along familial lines and the exacting singularity of experience. The assimilation of Black Politics into the Amnerican mainstream will not occur until this nation can elect a descendant of African slaves to the Presidency.
  • BlackButterfly · 1 year ago
    As long as we live in an America that is disproportionately controlled by one ethnic group that is concerned with the social, economic, political and cultural domination of American society...there will always be a need for people of color(Black, Hispanic, Native American, Indian, Asian...) to champion the needs and rights of their ethnic group in the pursuit of one day living in a better America that values the sum of ALL of its parts.
  • jed · 1 year ago
    Is black politics a single entity? Are Obama's politics really the same as Cynthia McKinney's, or are their differences enough to say that they represent different groups of blacks? Does Obama still represent black interests, or is the scope of presidency so wide that representation is abstracted to a higher level that eliminates color lines?
  • RonnieB · 1 year ago
    I don't believe that Barack is the "end" of Black politics. Rather, I believe he personifies a new Black politics. More stealth, more practical, and not so much less activism, but a cooperative activism. In other words, Obama (and Corey Booker, Deval Patrick, Harold Ford (sorry, rik) and other 40-ish Black pols) have learned the art of cooperative effort. Not selling out, but rather compromise and triangulation.

    See how Barack relates to White people of all political stripes, while married to a visibly Black woman; living in a largely Black city; worshipping in a largely Black church; and surrounding himself with mostly Black friends. And while he's living as a Black man, he has a rainbow of non-Black family members.

    Being a successful Black politician today is an art. And we're witnessing an artist like no other.
  • CPL · 1 year ago
    Ronnie, I'l forgive you for including Harold Ford in that bunch. He has no sense of civil rights heritage and runs from it every chance he gets. That's why he gets no mo love in Memphis...especially with Snowflake on his arm.

    Cory Booker was smarter than Harold and had experienced racism up close, despite an advantaged, privileged upbringing - the white kids still teased him about those naps on his head. Besides, Sharpe James was a crook and needed to be relieved of duties (not to mention heading for jail now).

    Harold Ford was not a part of this bunch, so quit telling that lie about him ;-). He knew how to kiss ass - not compromise, cause that's a fine art of giving something up without selling out.
  • RonnieB · 1 year ago
    C'mon CPL, can't I get a *little* latitude with Harold? I've been writing to him regularly about not kissing so much booty. I'm trying to work with the brotha. I think he's got potential. :-)

    Oh, and what's so wrong with having a white wife? ;-)

    {ducking and running for cover...}
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    RonnieB: :>) :>) :>) LOL :>) :>:) :>)
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Obama is not the end. Obama is just the beginning, of something new that Black folks haven't experienced. And, it's going to be scary, because it's a whole other page that we've never seen before, and we'll be making it up as we go along. I think that's wonderful.
  • glory · 1 year ago
    There is a flying-by-the-seat-of-our-pants -ness to this phenomenon of Black politicians doing things in a new way...
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    rikyrah: Co-sign!
  • Plantsmantx · 1 year ago
    Ok, I've read every comment in this thread, and kdizo seems to be the only one who comes within miles of saying anything about what should be done, and how it should be done. And as I said, he/she only came within miles. What do you younger folks intend to DO, exactly? What's your plan? Gimme some detail here.
  • ruthdfw · 1 year ago
    I like the joke posted on Booker T Rising's blog: "As comedian Wanda Sykes has joked that "if he wins, black people are gonna have to come up with a new excuse. You can't blame the man when you are the man."
  • Plantsmantx · 1 year ago
    A new excuse for what? And will I, as a black person, actually be "the man" if Obama is elected?
  • Sula · 1 year ago
    Some interesting points here. I think it's worth noting that Matt Bai, the article's author, probably did not choose the title, which was chosen by editors to perhaps elicit a certain response from readers. (The American Scholar made a similar move by titling a recent article by Charles Johnson, "The End of the Black American Narrative").

    I've familiar with some of Matt Bai's other writings, most notably, his book _The Argument: Argument: Billionaires, Bloggers, and the Battle to Remake Democratic Politics_. I'm thinking this recent article moves in that direction and is less concerned with "an end" and more focused on the factors that are influencing an internal *argument* or differing perspectives among a particular group, in this case black folx.

    In this regard, the piece is useful for putting a few issues on table, as opposed to trying to propose a definite answer or conclusion. But I'm certainly interested in seeing where things do from here, especially in local sectors.
  • TRW · 1 year ago
    I thought the article was interesting, but I also think that the author was a bit presumptuous in several places. I guess I am the voice of dissent on this thread. I don't know what "Black politics" means, or should look like. As many posters have pointed out, just because you are Black does not mean you are going to be an effective public servant, or do anything to uplift the Black community. At the same time, I wish the divisions into groups would come to an end. That is one of the reasons that I am frustrated right now. It seems that Black people continue to fight the fight on the fringes, instead of forming broad based groups with other people to accomplish our goals.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    I agree with those that say Obama doesn't signify the end of Black politics, but rather the end of Black politics as we know it. The ascendancy of Black politicians like Obama, Booker, Nutter, Patrick....etc. gives permission to fight injustices that plague our community in ways that differ from the tactics our Black political forbears have used.
  • Nquest · 1 year ago
    What are the different tactics and where are the results that these new/different tactics have been or are showing signs of working?
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    When I speak of different tactics, I'm talking about doing something other than simply marching in the streets, giving speeches in churches, organizing symbolic gestures such as having funerals for the N word...etc. Our community is dealing with a different set of obstacles, yet the "Old Guard" is intent on using outdated tools to solve these new problems. A perfect example is what Bruce Gordon faced against the the 64 member NAACP board.

    The results of these new tactics remain to be seen because they're being clocked by the resistance from those set in their ways.
  • TRW · 1 year ago
    I agree. If the NAACP had vision, and maybe they have come up with this idea and I missed it, instead of pushing for race-based programs they should push for class-based programs that affects a wide range of people (I think Bruce Gordon would have been hip to this).
  • Plantsmantx · 1 year ago
    Pushing for class-based programs rather than race-based ones- ok, that's one, I guess. What are some of the other new tactics?
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    Sepia: Co-sign. Is that like "thinking out side of the proverbial box?" I'm for that!!! New tools for old problems - YES!!! :>) :>)

    This technology "tool" helped in the win against billary!! She wasn't ready for Mr. O's type of political strategy! :>) Evidence - her tired A88 web site! :>) :>)
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    When I was in college, which was some time ago, we used to say that the letters NAACP stood for the National Association for the Advancement of Certain People. Not much has changed in all these years.
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    Hmmm...
    Since Hillary lost and Bill is whining that he is not a racist (yeah, whatever), does this mean that the Clintons are the end of white politics?
    (Hey, somebody had to ask ;-))
  • GreenLadyHere · 1 year ago
    Admiral: "virtual dap" for your bravery! :>) :>) :>) :>)
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    Once again, the political capital of the black electorate is being used by people who are quite open in asserting that it is not their responsibility to address any of the political demands of the black electorate. If Corey Booker, for example, does not want to be the go-to-guy on inner-city issues then perhaps he should have remained in the majority white suburbs where he grew up and launched his political career from whatever political base he could have cobbled together there on his behalf.

    I understand that these folks have larger ambitions and they would prefer not to be permanently assigned to the black seat. Their current posture, however, seems disingenuous in the extreme given that their political ascendancy (and celebrity) was made possible because they found more secure footing for their own ambitions among black voters. Now they will use the legitimate aspirational desires of these same voters to move on to higher office while denying any responsibility for addressing issues that have disproportionate effect on African Americans.

    It has become commonplace to the point of cliche to talk about the alleged generational divide among blacks on the question of what black leadership means. The existence of this alleged divide is only possible if one assumes that those of us who are consigned to the box labeled "Civil Rights Generation" were always of one mind and one view. We never were. There were always divisions among us over the most pressing questions of the period and that included international affairs as well.

    Artur Davis and other aspiring black politicians who share his views appear to be little more than younger versions of those who I have described elsewhere as being "second line inheritors" of the Civil Rights Movement. That is, those who attained political power less as a result of any sacrifices or risk they took but, rather, because they positioned themselves to take advantage of the opportunities created by the sacrifices and risks that others in their generation took. What exactly, for example, did Tom Bradley do or not do to rise to the rank of lieutenant in the notoriously racist Los Angeles Police Department and why did that department's behavior remain essentially unchanged during his four terms as mayor?

    These are not radical or extremists questions because they go straight to the heart of this issue. If the Tom Bradleys and Artur Davises do not address the needs of the black electorate then what actual purpose is served by the black electorate in supporting their quests for political office? If electing Obama to the White House means that we get nothing more than a payoff on our aspirational desires and we understand and accept that reality, then we have no further complaint. If, however, we believe that he has a duty to address our issues because we have supported his candidacy then we have every right to make our views known and to demand attention. Every other group in America - business, labor, attorneys, Hispanics, Jews, women, faith-based organizations etc. - will have their hands out because it is the American way. Are we suddenly less American because a black family lives in the White House?
  • rmalveaux · 1 year ago
    We are witnessing a shift in who is considered African-American and thus we are seeing a change in Black Politics. Throughout American political history Black Politics was regarded as the monolithic, collective politics of the emancipated slaves and their descendants, usually characterized by the presence of a charismatic leader . In the 21st century, African-American is defined as an American citizen of African descent. This would include Americans of African descent who are not descended of emancipated slaves, like Sen. Obama.
    The shift in definition of who is African American gave rise to the shift in Black politics. The dynamism of Black Politics reflects the regional, cultural, class and circumstantial differences among African Americans The New Black Politics is built upon earlier Black political accomplishments and developments, however as the political constituencies have become more diverse, the strategies and goals of Black Politics have changed as well.
    The future of Black Politics is predicated on the ability of Black leaders and their constituencies to address the injustices and inequalities of Black life in America in real, tangible concrete ways. Obama's presidency offers the opportunity for Black Politics and its operatives to address and solve some of the most critical of our nation's ills. Sound, compassionate policies in health care, labor, criminal justice, green initiatives, civil and reproductive rights and other areas of public policy benefit all Americans, and historically Black Americans have been at the forefront of all progressive political and social changes in our country.
    Black Politics have been the conscience of the nation since the country's founding. We have righted this nation's path at the expense of our lives and treasure, even when our countrymen showed us no love. Now is the time we should assert ourselves to lead in this new fight as we have in the past.
    We are the Soul of America and right now Obama is Soul Brotha #1.
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    We are the Soul of America and right now Obama is Soul Brotha #1.

    I'm old school. James Brown is still Soul Brotha #1. Senator Obama is a brother who we would like to see elected as president.
  • rmalveaux · 1 year ago
    Yeah, you're ol' skool alright. I didn't mean to offend you or the Godfather, but you get what I'm sayin'?
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    I wasn't offended at all. No need to apologize. I just don't grant that sort of space to politicians.
  • Anderkoo · 1 year ago
    From the article: "Black leaders who rose to political power in the years after the civil rights marches came almost entirely from the pulpit and the movement, and they have always defined leadership, in broad terms, as speaking for black Americans. They saw their job, principally, as confronting an inherently racist white establishment, which in terms of sheer career advancement was their only real option anyway."

    I wrote my college thesis 11 years ago about a similar phenomenon in Boston's Chinatown -- two political styles, one born of the Civil Rights movement, one predating it -- both of which presumed to speak the community. I found both troubling and disempowering of the community itself, which struck me as practically captured by its supposed "leaders." And this was before the current era of post-CR politics.

    There was a lot of value, I felt, in these two factions competing for the loyalty of the community, because that held them accountable. And maybe that's what's happening now across America across many political circles, not just African-American, but also white liberal, environmental, gay, evangelical. And, yes, Republican. Each group is struggling with a generational divide and an emerging new politics. (What a terrible year for Mark Penn to roll with "microtrends": if there is a macrotrend happening today, it is a change from the ideological to the pragmatic.) Environmentalists are embracing the market. Evangelicals are moving on from abortion. Gays are making sense of what legal marriage means for their historically marginalized status.

    New politics -- new leadership. Is there an end in sight of "black politics"? I guess it's worth asking if there's such a thing any more of "Irish politics," "Italian politics," and "Jewish politics." (For better or worse, my thesis notwithstanding, there isn't much to say about "Asian-American politics"). It was clear for someone like Mayor Nutter that the end of a distinctive, isolated, ghettoized "black politics" is a desired goal -- a sign of true integration, even if incomplete. At the very least, perhaps, a leadership shakeup is always an accountability moment, which is never a bad thing in democracy.
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    "It was clear for someone like Mayor Nutter that the end of a distinctive, isolated, ghettoized "black politics" is a desired goal -- a sign of true integration, even if incomplete."

    Given the fact that the majority of the residents of Philadelphia are African Americans, what do you believe Nutter is specifically referring to?
  • Anderkoo · 1 year ago
    I'd take him at his word: “Look, I never asked anybody to be for me because I was black... I asked people to be for me because I thought I was the best candidate when I ran for City Council and when I ran for mayor. I’m proud of the votes I received. I’m proud I received the votes of the majority of the African-American community and the majority of the vote from the white community. But I never asked anybody to give me anything because I was black. I asked people to give me a chance because I thought I was the best.”
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    The question I asked pertained to Nutter's claim that the black electorate in Philadelphia was ghettoized when blacks represent a majority of the city's residents. I wasn't opposed to Nutter's election and overall it has been a positive development for that city but my question had nothing to do with who Nutter sought support from during his race.
  • Anderkoo · 1 year ago
    I don't know Philly politics so I can't say! But I suppose it's possible for a majority to be ghettoized, or a majority of the majority (= minority) to be captured is another way to look at it. Like evangelicals in the Republican party, or blacks in the Democratic. But I really don't know in Nutter's specific case, really. What's your opinion on this?
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    My opinion is that Nutter is still angry and is somewhat embittered, although he denies it, toward the city's old line black leadership. Nutter's lingering sense of resentment toward these folks maybe understandable but, in truth, there was no compelling reason for the black electorate in Philly to embrace him. Prior to his decision to run for mayor, Nutter did very little to distinguish himself as a member of the city council or as a politician. He and his supporters may deny it but he was basically a go-along to get-along pol.
  • monica · 1 year ago
    I live in Philly so I have to point out a couple of things. Although the neighborhoods are segregated, the make-up of the city is 45% white and 43% black with Latinos and Asians making up the difference. That's why his election was such a watershed moment. He was the best candidate for the city black or white. The residents of the city voted on his record and his integrity. John Street was an incompetent a-hole. Anyone (of any color) would have been an improvement but we were blessed with two candidates who were capable (D Evans was the other).

    The Philadelphia political situation is indeed unique and ghettonized was the best way to describe it prior to the election of Nutter. We had black elected officials and political power, but the economy was in shambles and violent crime was rampant. All Street did was throw his hands up and lined his pockets and those of his family and friends.

    Maybe Nutter is bitter. I am too.
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    My family and I live in West Chester (East Bradford Township). I can't disagree at all with your assessment of Philadelphia politics, although I was mistaken about the current demographics. Nutter is a vast improvement over Street and would be better than Fattah but I still would not describe the city's politics as being ghettoized.

    Black folks inherited and adopted a political system and a political regime that had long been in place before they became its leaders. Nutter was a garden variety product of this system until he saw an opportunity to distinguish himself. No fault finding here.

    All politicians are opportunists. The real issue is whether they have talent or not. Nutter has talent but he will never be elected governor of Pennsylvania. We lived eight years in Hershey and folks in central and western PA are not going to elect a black person to occupy the mansion on Front Street in Harrisburg.
  • PTCruiser · 1 year ago
    "...there isn't much to say about "Asian-American politics").

    Many, many Asian Americans would take strong exception to this assertion.
  • Anderkoo · 1 year ago
    Sure they would, and obviously I wrote my thesis on the topic, and maybe it's different out in CA, but there just aren't enough Asian Americans in most communities to add up to a machine. Flushing, NY is one exception here on the east coast. (I should add "East Asian" as opposed to Indian or other parts of Asia).
  • michon · 1 year ago
    Interesting article; better than what the NY Times usually does on the topic of race (usually very badly IMO). But the ENDof black politics? I don't think so. That's like saying the founding of the NAACP marked the end of black politics a la Frederick Douglass; or the black power movement was the end of the politics of Bethune, Houston, Terrell. I think the 'perceived power struggle has more to do with personalities like the black political power brokers sited in the articles than generation politics.

    Among grassroots organizers and cultural professionals I know, I see a lot of back and forth respect between the generations and for those who've come before any of us. But everyone likes to have something they can call "their stuff." However, the environment, jobs, energy, Iraq, and globalization are and have been black issues. They will be regardless of the outcome in November.

    Jill Tubman suggested I share my take on "generation Obama." It's like a border group between Gen X and the Baby Boomers. [As of this election year we were kicked out of the Boomer group]. Our influences were the WW II generation (pragamatism) - grandparents, uncles, aunts, and perhaps parents. They were our rocks. They only had one TV and stereo (yep, that's what we called it) in the house. We watched what they watched. We listened to Nat King Cole, Sinatra, Sarah, maybe a little Johnny Cash. They were unselfishly sentimental. Second influence was the civil rights and black power generation (justice issues, multiculturalism, African diaspora). They may have been our older siblings or parents. If they were into the diaspora, they gave us the multi-cultural perspective. We were encouraged to demand, not ask; fight not flight and call it when we saw it. We were proud of who were were as we were - "Say It Loud..." Finally there's the coming of age years (Reagan). We were the test market for MTV and video games. Hip Hop was Rap and some of it stuck with us or we slipped our parents'/siblings'Nina Simone, Coltrane, Aretha and Sarah stash into the trunk of the car and headed back to campus where we fused with Ruben Blades, Willie Colon, Celia Cruz. Participated in panels hosted by the Asian Student Association, and pushed the board to divest from South Africa. AIDS came on the scene. Crack on the city streets. The divestment movement taught us something about investments, globalization, and commerce. It may have been the first serious encounter with the Wall Street Journal. We were intrigued.

    All that said (and it's just a sprinkling), this group that includes Obama can't be neatly put into a box. "Border crossers" may be the closest label. The generations opened the doors. So many influences; and we probably have been receptive in some form or fashion to all of them.
  • Zhana · 1 year ago
    As several have said here, this is not the end, this is just the beginning.

    I hope all who have commented here will join my Obama phone-in on 19th August.
  • LL · 1 year ago
    Booker T. Obama is not the end of black politics.
    Booker T. Obama is the anticlimax of neoliberal politics.
  • Karmi · 1 year ago
    I posted about this in the Wednesday Open Thread, and finished reading the article a little while ago. Matt Bai is a white semi-liberal (or recovering liberal), but he did a fairly good job on the article.

    Personally, I think that the era of “black politics” ended some time ago, though its influence could still be seen when Sen. Lott was attacked by the left and he had to step down from the majority leader role. Still, that was just the entire left’s – along with its MSM – Modus Operandi of promoting hatred against anyone not agreeing with them (e.g. Robert Byrd still remains). Basically, the majority of Americans have been tired of “black politics” for some time now…as this article points out with the interviews.

    Then came the primaries with Obama and Hillary, catching the usual Identity Politics of the Democratic Party off guard, and “black politics” surfaced again. Missed during all the accusations against Hillary and Bill being “racists”, was Obama’s own 20-year connections to the BLT racists, i.e. that blacks can be racists also. It will be hard to use “black politics” ‘as usual’ in the future, because the term racism will be hurled back into the faces of those claiming it, e.g. McCain’s throwing Obama’s use of the ‘Race Card’ back at Obama, and to a small degree, Whoopi’s claim of black ownership of the N-Word. White Americans may not have said much about Wright and Obama’s connection to him and BLT yet, but they noticed…noticed that something wasn’t right. I look for pressure to soon mount against Democratic Convention CEO Rev. Leah Daughtry (“Jeremiah Wright in a skirt”).

    Interesting times ahead…
  • JibreelRiley · 1 year ago
    Black Politics ended in the 1990's with mayors like Marion Barry and David Dinkins. The fact that DC re-elected the guy alone is scary enough and New York City is one of the most liberal cities in America has not seen a Democrat mayor in over a Decade (thats 10 years for you GEDers). Gov Deval looks like he will last one term. Philly has turn into West Beirut and Detroit is just a great example of what happens when Democrats run cities. I can ramble on but most of you are still blaming Reagan for your woes.