Community Page
- www.jackandjillpolitics.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Katharine Weymouth to WaPo Readers: F**k You by Thomas C [Subscribe] Share this on Twitter - Katharine Weymouth to WaPo Readers: F**k You Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 07:13:35 AM PDT Katharine Weymouth,...
- I don't often agree with you, but I do agree on this, the ability to choose, think, reason and have values is what separates us from the animals.
- the first family leaves for Russia http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-06-voa2.cfm
- I think one of the biggest mistakes folks are making is in thinking that sex is the basis of marriage. It isn't. There are so many other variables to marriage. Infidelity is just one thing that...
- I tell my friends who even consider cheating to release the thought and buy a toy. It is not worth it.
Jack and Jill Politics
A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics
So welcome onto the not-so-straight express where John McCain straight up lies about the fact that he’s said repeatedly that he don’t know jack about economics. NOW, of course that the Republicans are partly responsible for flushing our economy down a toilet swirl with poor policy and way out of control deficit spending — now [...]SHARETHIS.addEntry({
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
I was just wondering how this article makes the left look like it is worried? Personally, I think that the press seems to have an ongoing love affair with both Obama and McCain, but the fact remains McCain has not been called out on a lot of his double talk, and this is one issue where he was talking out the side of his neck and then changed his mind. Barack has done the same thing, but it seems his mistakes/gaffes get replayed for a week straight whereas McCain's might get a passing mention. Why can't the press just hold both candidates feet to the fire in the interest of giving the voters the best information possible?
1 year ago
Mainly Jill's title, and sub-title caught my eye. I didn't even watch the video.
Obama has never been vetted...sure, there has been mentionings of the likes of Wright, Ayers, Rezko, etc., but no real digging by the press beyond that. It's like Obama waves-a-hand, and the press swoons.
Apparently we see what is going on differently.
Thanks for the reply!
1 year ago
Thanks for the reply. You think that Obama hasn't been vetted? I think the opposite. I think he has been and will continue to be "vetted," but it seems so far that the press can't find anything of substance to stick.
Ayers: I think the guy was an idiot for setting bombs to send a political message, but what does what he did 40 years ago have to do with Obama sitting on a board of an organization with him that is geared toward helping children?
Wright: I have mixed feelings about Wright. He has said things that agree/disagree with. But as Wright has already acknowledged. Obama is his own man, and has formed his own opinions, so I find it pretty laughable that people were trying to paint Wright as this guy that was influencing his policy decisions.
Rezko: Obama's dealings with him illustrated poor judgment, as he readily admitted, but the prosecution of Rezko didn't reveal any wrongdoing from Obama. Rezko even revealed that the prosecutors were pushing for information on Obama but he refused to implicate him where there was no there there. And I find it amusing that people always yell Rezko to illustrate that Obama was involved in shady dealings but glance over McCain's history with the Keating 5 scandal, Abramoff, etc.
It seems that people view Obama as this unknown entity, whereas I feel that I don't know much about McCain yet either. Just this narrative about him being a POW, which is fine, but he has a long political record that hasn't fully come to light.
1 year ago
Just my 2-cents...
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
Having said that, I do hope the new campaign staff gets him back on message.
1 year ago