-
Website
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/ -
Original page
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/12/mccain-losing-votes-to-obama-in-nh/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
RobM
4558 comments · 1373 points
-
D.
4445 comments · 442 points
-
Justice58
8687 comments · 2770 points
-
Sepia
3709 comments · 5265 points
-
spirit_55z
11766 comments · 4355 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Afternoon Open Thread
1 day ago · 110 comments
-
People have asked about Jane Hamsher
18 hours ago · 73 comments
-
Thursday Open Thread
1 day ago · 87 comments
-
Afternoon Open Thread
4 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Tuesday Open Thread
2 days ago · 104 comments
-
Afternoon Open Thread
Also, I think from the 2006 (and Obama's 2004 Senate election for that matter) elections that there's evidence that the Bradley effect is on its way out. It seems to me that both liberals and conservatives will vote for a candidate of another race as long as that candidate matches their views.
As for Hillary, you're right. She can't get elected. You can't win with 48% of the vote, and there's no way she can get that now. It isn't because of her gender. It's because she's been around for 16 years, and made a ton of enemies in the process...
Republicans love wedge issues...Abortion, Gay Marriage, etc.
If she gets the nom, Hillary Clinton will be their wedge issue for 2008. People like me will be disengaged...i'll tune-out...and having Obama as VP will not be a saving grace.
It's sort of like how I deal with this Bush Administration...whenever Bush is on TV, I try to change the channel, leave the room, go somewhere else...i avoid watching that monkey...see no evil, hear no evil. The same will apply to Hillary.
Give me a President that I want to watch. Let me come home at night and find out what First Lady Michelle Obama's been doing lately. Give me a reason to be engaged.
Obama vs Huckabee...that's going to be a great race to watch.
I'll admit (now) that Obama is electable, and might even do a half decent job as president.
No way he beats McCain, though. Even if you take the War on Terror out of the equation, there's no comparison between the two.
Huckabee v. Obama would be a much needed contest, and would be good for the country. But voters don't want that. They want to be rabid fanatics who root for their favorite political team.
George W. Bush is rigid, inflexible, and calls things the way he sees them.
Clearly those are proving to be undesirable traits in a 21st century president.
Here's what I mean by those:
Rigidity: someone who knows what their beliefs are, and who will stand beside them, even if they hurt him politically.
Inflexibility: the ability to hear public opinion, but not go back and forth over what the public wants on a daily basis (because we all know, it changes all the time).
What's undesirable about that? Or would we rather have a president who can't make the hard calls and will do whatever the public wants, even if it's not in their best interest?