<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Jack and Jill Politics - Latest Comments in Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/</link><description>A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:29:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960152</link><description>d.,&lt;br&gt;Much love to you, brother :)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Felicia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960151</link><description>Felicia,&lt;br&gt;Obama is the Anti-Christ...you ain't know?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joking. :)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960150</link><description>anon 07:15 said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;So that is really what this is all about. Has it really been that bad? Or is it just not what you want to hear?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, I teach college in the South, and I'm the only black person in class.  I have no problem with opposing views.  I do, however, have a problem reading the same damn email on 20 different blogs about how Obama is the Manchurian Candidate/Anit-Christ.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, not ragging on d. because I love ya, brother, but if I know who's writing stuff that I don't agree with, and we've had the same disagreement before, it is nice to know I can ignore that person (not you d.) because we've been around that mountain before.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Felicia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960149</link><description>It's the internet. Anonymity &amp; psuedonyms are the order of the day. If you want/need personalized interaction with people who can be "acounted" for, then it's time to turn off the computer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spiderbytes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960148</link><description>i am anonymous and i love it!  i wish more sites would allow anonymous - i for one am TIRED of creating log-ins and id's for every damn thing on the net.  its too much committment for me.  i love this site and i think allowing anonymous will encourage more people to post comments.  there are plenty of sites that i enjoy that i never leave comments because i am tired of all the user names and passwords and email verifications.  i love the net, hate constantly remembering my identity. PLEASE KEEP ANON :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960147</link><description>Just wanted to add that pseudos help in fostering blog relationships.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've started to look for comments by pseudos that I find interesting and/or in keeping with my opinions.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ms.Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960146</link><description>My only problem with the anon post is that it gets a little confusing when you're trying to respond and there are several anons and you have to figure out what time the anon you're responding to posted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible to have a direct link to respond to a specific comment?  If so, that would take care of the anon situation for me.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love you guys thanks for all your work and could someone please post on the story on the ajc regarding Michelle Obama's Princeton roomate's honesty about feelings of Michelle back then that are in line with her thoughts on her time at Princeton - Please.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nichelle gave the link in a post on the open thread.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ms.Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960145</link><description>Some readers act as if this brain surgery.  You didn't know you could just type in a name and fake url?   Are you serious?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Posters should be held accountable for their comments on a blog?  It's not like any questions or criticisms of Obama or Jack, Jill, Rikyah or DNA are addressed.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what are you going to do, spank anons  them if they write something you don't like.  Are you going to ban their ip addresses?  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are aware if you do that you will have effectively ended the intellectual exchange you claim you want and become a organizational tool for the BO campaign.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, the result will be a forum where Obama  supporters figuratively "jerk each other off" as they discuss the greatness that is Barack.  (Kinda like the DailyKos)&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that's the end you desire then blogspot offers the option of only allowing posts with gmail accounts to respond.  You may suffer a decrease in comments but if you don't care about that, it doesn't matter.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anon,Fan of Fauntroy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960144</link><description>I vote for no anonymous postings.  While there are certainly exceptions to the rule, I find having some kind of name typically results in more thoughtful and less acrimonious comments.  I like and encourage dissent, but it is rarely fun to see people be jerks to others.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carol McCullough</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960143</link><description>Waggie,&lt;br&gt;I'm a conservative myself...lol.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;S,&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960142</link><description>I tried to use the name thing before and wasn't allowed. I used a different server and now have no issues. And D. I will try my best to help against the anonymous conservative. I do acknowledge  that many of the anonymous posters do post offensive things and hide behind anonymous. I still stand by that not all anonymous posting is bad. Some might have had the issues I had with my server. It might have been easy for you Rhonda, but it took me two times to post with a name on my other server. Just a thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwaggie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960141</link><description>Sorry, that was me above, I was just testing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No anonymous posts!! Getting a name is very easy!! I tried it myself.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RhondaCoca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:07:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960140</link><description>test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rhonda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960139</link><description>I vote no "anonymous" comments as well because&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) The commenter can STILL be anonymous by scrolling down and selecting Name/URL and writing in any name they want - even without a URL.   I add my URL but it is not required if you don't want to use one.  You can just make up a name.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) It is indeed less confusing when there are 5 anonymous comments in a row - whatever the viewpoint.  I find myself skipping especially long Anonymous comments because it is easy to confuse them and time is short as it is.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nichelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960138</link><description>a former anon d wants to meet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">s</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960137</link><description>You see I have balls (not literally) I have my name and my picture...lol!!! You can even see my profile...lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;JJP no anons, I have been saying it for a while. Get a name and you are welcom regardless of your viewpoints. We accept ppl with different viewpoints. We can respond to you easier. When I keep seeing anon, anon, anon...I get confused. When you have a name, I take you seriously. Period.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From looking at your poll, I think everyone agrees with me for the most part=)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RhondaCoca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960136</link><description>&lt;i&gt;"let the cowards come and spew their divisive rhethoric"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, with THAT said, it would be interesting to know how many of the anonymous posters actually present an opposing viewpoint.Far as I know, there's two people who consistently disagree, and I ain't hiding.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're going to post consistently, take a name. If you're just popping in occasionally, it shouldn't matter.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960135</link><description>Just because an anon poster writes something that is deemed offensive, it does not mean that it cant be dealt with. That is the beauty of Blogging, it is free wheeling and self correcting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So what if some Troll gets on here? --we are smart educated folks who will deal with them!...let the cowards come and spew their divisive rhethoric--I think it helps some here who will better shape an arguement against the other side.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960134</link><description>Freespirit is correct. Have the stones to reveal yourself. For a blog on culture, etc. it's not such a big deal. Lighthearted though often with an edge--you don't need to necessarily reveal yourself. But for politics, yes, I think the bright line needs drawing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Chambers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960133</link><description>get rid of anon posters.  They need to be held accountable for their comments good or bad.  IT's not like their identity will be compromised.  Seems to me most anon's love anonymity and can say anything they want without retribution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freespiritbeautee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960132</link><description>waaaaaaah.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis Smilezee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960131</link><description>I don't think you should allow anonymous comments for the following reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Its simple enough to click on "name" at the end of the post. Its not like you are asking people to sign up for a google account &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) People aren't loosing the right to be anonymous, as they can post under a pseudonym and even change them with each post if they want.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Its easier to address someones post when you can refer to an actual name rather than "anon".&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960130</link><description>As your traffic increases you'll get more idiots. How much time do you have to moderate comments?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prometheus 6</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960129</link><description>waaaaaaaah.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Should we allow anonymous comments? (Updated With Video!)</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/04/poll-should-we-allow-anonymous-comments-updated-with-video/#comment-1960128</link><description>test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">testing</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>