-
Website
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/ -
Original page
http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/satire-or-stereotype/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
Yes it's a horrible offensive, juvenile and annoying image, but it's promoting a piece whose headline is clearly visible
BET Founder Apologiese for His Portrayal of a Black Man.
The article text goes:
"Hillary Clinton supporter—and the reason for television shows like "Hot Ghetto Mess"—Robert Johnson apologized for making a reference to Senator Barack Obama's admitted teenage drug use. Johnson now claims his tasteless comments were "made in haste in an attempt to be funny."
No need for regrets, Mr. Johnson. We all know there's only one way for Harvard Law grad Obama to earn your respect."
This is a dis on Bob Johnson, not the Obamas.
Hmmm... I wonder why?
If Obama wins the nomination, not only will he leap frog over the entitled HillBill but all of those black establishment leaders that have been waiting patiently for queen Hillary to be crowned.
As a matter of fact, I do believ that Curry's cover shot of Clarance in that Lawn Jockey outfit led to Bob Johnson outing him and dismantling the magazine altogether, which should tell everyone what a tool Bob Johnson is.
But, I saw that pic of Senator Obama and his wife and got ready to fire off emails to Ariananna and ask her just what the hell is she doing, fueling stereotypes like this?
Someone needs to call Stephen Colbert and allow him to school people in the art of Satire, cause it is an art form not for just anyone to engage in.
"But it's been the Clinton-Obama joust that's shoved the Hillary loathe even deeper into the absurd. A textbook example of that was Clinton's recent Martin Luther King, Jr. tiff with Obama. Clinton merely said that Lyndon Johnson gave final impetus to the push to get the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Bill through Congress. That straightforward and complimentary comment got twisted, mangled, and distorted to read that Clinton dissed Dr. King by minimizing his towering role in the civil rights movement. Clinton was talking solely about the Congressional fight for passage of the bill, not the civil rights movement. But it didn't matter. The Obama camp sniffed yet another chance at a Hillary bash ran with it. But they weren't finished. They picked up on a stray remark by BET founder Robert Johnson about Obama's days as an organizer on Chicago's South Side to imply that Obama did all kinds of nasty, insidious things in his younger days.
But here's the rub. Johnson was forced to apologize to Obama for his real, imagined, or likely manufactured slight. Yet as of this writing there's no sign of any like apology from the Obama camp for distorting and then blowing up Clinton's King compliment. His much touted agreement with Hillary to tone down the race attacks is not the same as an apology. Don't bet that that "truce" will last. "
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/chris-matthews-had-the-gu_b_82157.html
And if you see it for what it is-satire-you'll see that it's not that big a deal.
That does not denigrate King. It makes his achievement all the more miraculous -- winning a permanent stake in the system for a previously disenfranchised people, having begun with no political cards to play.
In my view, the real problem with Clinton's statement was the implied historical analogy -- that the subordinate position King held in relation to Johnson, a function of the discrimination and disenfranchisement of the time, somehow needs recapitulation today when none of those conditions apply.
The analogy Clinton was implying was obvious: I'm Lyndon Johnson, unlovely doer; he's Martin Luther King, charismatic dreamer. Vote for me if you want results.
Forty years ago, that arrangement -- white president enacting African-American dreams -- was necessary because discrimination denied blacks their own autonomous political options. Today, that arrangement -- white liberals acting as tribune for blacks in return for their political loyalty -- is a demeaning anachronism. That's what the fury at Hillary was all about, although no one was willing to say so explicitly.
--Charles Krauthammer, Jan. 18,2008
And if you see it for what it is-satire-you'll see that it's not that big a deal.
Naw, Scatman; it's satirical if it depicts John and Elizabeth Edwards. It's stereotypical -- a Black man as a pimp and a Black woman as his ho -- when it's Senator and Mrs. Obama.
It's a joke. It's not that serious.
The stereotype is perpetuated.
Who benefits from the Obamas being portrayed in this manner? Beware the 'vast left-wing conspiracy' to take down Obama.
You can hear the ad on Marc Ambinder's blog on The Atlantic. Here is the script:
This is Magic Johnson. On the court and in life, successful leadership comes from hard work and experience. That’s why I’m endorsing Hillary Clinton for President. We have great candidates this year, but I believe only Hillary is a proven leader, with 35 years’ experience dealing with challenges facing America. Are you looking for better jobs, universal health care, better treatment for veterans, opportunities for your children? Then you want Hillary Clinton for President. My rookie year, we won our first game on a last second shot. I was so hyped. But the captain of my team said, “take it easy rookie, it’s a long season, it’s a long road to the championship.” He was right. Winning comes from years of hard work and preparation. Whether it’s winning championships or a President who can lead us back to greatness, I’ll always want the most prepared and experienced person leading my team. That’s why I’m asking you to join me in voting for Hillary Clinton for President.
I wonder if HuffPo will post my photoshop'd picture of Massa Bill and Mistress Hillary standing on their Plantation's Porch, watching all of their slaves pick cotton under the Hot SC Sun...
Bob Johnson
Stephanie Tubbs-Jones
Andrew Young
Sheila Jackson Lee
Charlie Rangel
John Lewis
Let me go download some images from ROOTS, and start superimposing these handkerchief heads...
It's called Equal Time folks.
If pimp gear is acceptable satire, then Mr Johnson should be dressed like that.
But Barack Obama is running for president of the United States and should be treated with dignity.
Of course if one objects too much, it promotes the story and the picture - and the eyeballs on the post.
If you find out where we can at least post a comment (I see no comments) please post.
You know, techinically speaking, Magic's right...you know, first term senator, not even through his first term. Granted, Obama has experience outside the federal government which may lend some benefit...but within it, he just got here.
of course the image "could" float out there independently of the context, but since when do you limit your speech because someone MIGHT take a word or phrase out of context?
imagine a group of protesters shouting "NO JUSTICE. NO PEACE" but they decide not to because they're afraid someone will only hear "NO PEACE" and take them for a violent, unreasonable mob.
google image search is no reason to NOT do satire. That makes no sense to me as an argument.
the intent here is seriously important. whoever put that piece together, in my opinion, threw a major punch at Mr. Johnson. To judge the photo without the accompanying article is like judging a punchline without the setup.
If I just said:
"..so the next day I went out and beat a white lady myself"
that makes no sense, sounds needlessly violent, etc.
But if you read the entire context:
"I was so shocked by the results in Iowa. Barack Obama became the first black man in American history to beat a white woman in public and get praised for it. Not only that, people saw it as a sign of progress. So the next day I went out a beat a white lady myself. Didn't work out as well for me."
I know images are powerful, and that's why I think this is such an indictment against Bob Johnson, but let's see this for what it is. The creators are NOT trying to dis Obama, and that is ABUNDANTLY CLEAR
and, more importantly, funny
Other than Hank's experience in the Senate (and pretending like she was married to a governor and president) what's her experience?
Exactly. Not much more than Obama's, except she wants to be the HNIC. Obama wants to lead.
If this image had shown up on HBO's "Def Comedy Jam," I wouldn't be surprised/bothered...If the pic shows up on the front of the NYTimes, I WOULD Be bothered.
And I am concerned with HuffPo's editorial decision to showcase the image on their main page. I'm sure that there are gazillions of disgusting images of Hillary and Bill (floating around in cyberspace--created by Republicans) that HuffPo could've tapped to show...but they did not.
I've never seen a "derogatory" image of the Clintons on HuffPo (which supposedly strives to be a reputable blogging spot).
There are appropriate "venues" for this type of satire...HuffPo lost a few points with me today.
You know, techinically speaking, Magic's right...you know, first term senator, not even through his first term. Granted, Obama has experience outside the federal government which may lend some benefit...but within it, he just got here.
D., you know, if it weren't for your website (Cute John McCain quote! Nice Obama oppo!! LOVE your Immigration stance!! And your Free Republic links! If you ever wanna see some good, old-fashioned racism, just head on over to that nutbin), I might be able to take you as an honest broker. It's one thing to argue with the pro-Hillary card, but ain't no way I'm getting into it with some Freeper John McCain fan.
See you in November.
Freedom of speech does not include freedom from criticism.
THAT was funny (and I don't mean that sarcastically). Maybe I'll get a bump in readership after that (okay, maybe not....).
McCain fan, yes; Freeper, not really-but does any of that make what I said about Obama any less true?
But, fine: November should be fun.
Ronnie,
I think sometimes you get me mixed up. I'm not a Clinton-Bill or Hillary-fan.
And Obama is a great guide, but I'm not sure he's actually a "leader."
I guess the Huff Post folks think this one is done very well, as they do seem particularly fond of this particular picture. You'll notice that, hours later, most of the page around it has changed, as new stuff goes up and other stuff gets pushed down or off the page... but that picture is still sitting right where it was (still with comments closed) - making sure that everyone gets a chance to appreciate the full satirical flavor of it, no doubt.
That's what that pic feels like to me...feels like something Don Imus would've done PRIOR to getting fired...
Like I said before, I respect/cherish freedom of speech...I like tackling controversial subject matter in my own art...but when you're in the media biz and supported by advertising, you have to walk a fine-line in your editorial decisions...or otherwise be targeted by the AL Sharptons of the World.
I think that HuffPo has exercised bad judgment in propagating that pic through the blogosphere. It's worthy of Drudge or Limbaugh, not the Huffington Post.
off to make some progressive college kids laugh. peace blog world!
this may have come from the paranoia of Taylor Marsh who is making wild claims and the Sun investigated and found nothing.
anyway, Oliver Willis posted about it and thought you guys would be interested in reading this:
http://www.oliverwillis.com/archives/2008/01/18/taylor-marsh-the-politics-of-p/
Seriously, i saw that while Hillary is trashing Obama for his remarks about Reagan and taking it out of the historical fact he was discussing, it seems she listed both Reagan and HW Bush as presidents she most admired.
Her campaign is furiously back peddling right now.
Ben Smith on Politico has a fun post about it.
Me, I don't much like the Huffington Post anyway - for the longest time they had no writers of color at all, then had mainly just writers who (if they were Black) would attack Black folks.
Taylor Marsh is a lying hack, but if you want to see even wackier anti Obama stuff, go here (former CIA Larry Johnson's site, with sidekick SusanUnPC).
A fun example:
"Jim Jones’ kool-aid killed his followers. The Barack Obama version will kill the Democrats if folks keep chugging this stuff down"
I'm not even an Obama supporter, although I will vote for him in the general because of the historic nature of the election (I used to say that about Hillary too, but no more), but I'm finding it absolutely fascinating the way that even the thought of him and his uppity self opposing Clinton is causing people to just lose their minds.
C'mon. Really?
I couldn't agree with Baratunde more. The intent matters. It has to. There's a whole conversation not being had here about whether that imagery is inherently and immutability insulting, and if so, why it is so.
I don't think it is.
http://www.236.com/about/about_us.php
Satire ain't easy. And it isn't always all that funny.
None of the other pieces on that web page rang irony, parody, or sarcasm bells for me. And I'm old enough to remember who Bobby Fisher was. Maybe it's the writer's strike.
Maybe I'm just sour after catching up on the Clinton shenanigans in Nevada.