DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Jack and Jill Politics is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Jack and Jill Politics

A black bourgeois perspective on U.S. politics
Jump to original thread »
Author

The Clinton Legacy with Black Voters

Started by baratunde aka jack turner · 1 year ago

Jack Turner passed this to me to talk about and both he and rikyrah have written to The Fix’s Chris Cilliza at WaPo to get him straight on this story. Cilliza seems confused about why African-American voters have turned away from the Clintons, why their brand with us has collapsed so hard so fast. He [...]SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "The Clinton ... Continue reading »

64 comments

  • on to the white house indeed. i can't wait.
  • I believe that being magnanimous in victory and gracious in defeat are virtues but I'm not quite ready to give Sr. Hillary any props right along through here. Maybe in a few weeks or a few months but not today or tomorrow. She was not gracious in defeat or during the campaign. Senator Obama can let her slide but I think I'm going to hold a grudge for a little bit.
  • I'm a Native American...and the Clintons will have to show me something. The Hill speach today was all good and well, but actions speak louder than words.


    I will believe it when I see it.
  • If Obama loses, I hold her responsible. Already the RNC is using her arguments against Obama as their talking points. She has work to do.


    A [white and very old] woman for President? It doesn't excite me, maybe because I know the media and the "feminists" don't include black women in that equation. A black female President might get my interest and sense of excitement.



    I'll get celebratory about Obama's candidacy if he wins the election, not a moment before.
  • I agree, ptcruiser. I'm not ready yet, either. I don't know if I'll ever be ready, actually. I look at the statement that their legacy will require major repair among blacks, and I wonder...why? That's leaving aside the question of whether or not it ever can be repaired.


    Sort of OT, but I watched a bit of a show on CNN called "Where Do They Stand?" At the end of the healthcare policy segment, John Roberts talked to a Republican strategist, and Joan Walsh "represented" the Democratic position. The Republican strategist talked up McCain's plan, and Walsh talked down Omama's plan. I suspect we'll see her playing that role often in the coming months.
  • Chris Matthews was right when he implied that Republicans fall in line but Democrats need to fall in love. Having people like Joan Walsh representing the Democrats' or Obama's positions on any topic is a joke at best. Salon.com, which is run by Walsh, actually used the word "uppity" to describe Obama a few months ago or longer. Obama can win this election but he is going to have to continue to rely on the Apache strategy: spread wide, keep running low to the ground and live off of the land.
  • Love this blog! So informative! Has anyone looked at Obama's website today? Senator Clinton's picture is the focal point with a huge thank you. On her website there is mention of Obama, but no picture and mushed in with other words. This shows that same sentiment of her speeches... to me, her heart's just not in it...Don't know if it ever will be...
  • Just quit grabbing at straws, JJP. Bury the hatchet and move on or else you will be looking at McCain taking the oath of office Jan 09. Goodness.
  • it was always about Hillary in Hilland


    lets get over it...it is now about Obamaland.....he is our nominee...he will win in November.



    the key is that all of us contribute time an money and spread the word.



    We will win this election.
  • is she gone yet? good riddance! are her surrogates still at it? how much longer til they run out of gas? i,m hoping by monday morning. good riddance to her nasty and intellectually dishonest self, campaign, and surrogates. good riddance! i give her no credit. she is loathesome. i am just relieved there appears to be a limit to her craziness. so i guess i give her credit that she could have been more crazy a little longer.
  • thank you hillary for not continuing the kitchen sink strategy past the point where you had officially lost and the contest was officially over.
  • Angela said...
    "I'm a Native American...and the Clintons will have to show me something. The Hill speach today was all good and well, but actions speak louder than words."



    "I will believe it when I see it."



    -WORD
  • i agree in theory with those who say let it go now...but as long as the surrogates are still out there lying and bullshitting...i just saw lanny davis and paul begala together on a cnn panel...i vote that "egghead" paul begala as my least favorite clinton surrogate. here is to hoping his relevance diminishes exponentially as the clintons reced further into history.
  • I don't think we should "let it go." The Clintons walked us down a very dangerous path and signified it was "ok" for Democrats to launch racial attacks on fellow Democrats. That it was "ok" to throw black voters under the bus. Had Hillary succeeded, it would have signaled to Democrats not to back non-white candidates in majority white elections, that blacks are best serving all black districts. See, this goes beyond Obama and I think people who are saying "well, it's over, so let it go" aren't seeing the bigger picture.


    I don't trust Bill or Hillary Clinton and I think they are up to something. Bill is too filled with hate in his heart for Obama. No way either one of them lets this go and cheerfully campaigns for Obama. Keep your eyes on their surrogates because I'm quite certain Geraldine Ferraro will still be out there whipping up racial resentment and whipping up white women against Obama. The only time to "let this go" is Jan. 20, 2009.
  • one of the saddest things this lily-white boy has learned during this campaign is how many racists there are in the Democratic Party.


    that just doesn't make sense to me. if you're going to be racist, why not be Republican? that way you won't even accidentally end up talking to someone who isn't a racist, which can be awkward.



    i find it odd that the sexism Hillary is suffered is considered to be A Crime Against Humanity, but the astonishing racism aimed at Obama is sort of brushed aside. sheesh.



    that said, i thought she did a good job, but she has to back it up with action. if she puts in even half the effort she did for her own campaign, Obama will kick McCain's ass up and down the electoral map.
  • I don't think we should "let it go." The Clintons walked us down a very dangerous path and signified it was "ok" for Democrats to launch racial attacks on fellow Democrats. That it was "ok" to throw black voters under the bus. Had Hillary succeeded, it would have signaled to Democrats not to back non-white candidates in majority white elections, that blacks are best serving all black districts. See, this goes beyond Obama and I think people who are saying "well, it's over, so let it go" aren't seeing the bigger picture.


    I don't trust Bill or Hillary Clinton and I think they are up to something. Bill is too filled with hate in his heart for Obama. No way either one of them lets this go and cheerfully campaigns for Obama. Keep your eyes on their surrogates because I'm quite certain Geraldine Ferraro will still be out there whipping up racial resentment and whipping up white women against Obama. The only time to "let this go" is Jan. 20, 2009.





    Town is on the money again.



    Her success would have meant that her campaign would have been used as the blueprint to DESTROY any Black candidate with aspirations higher than a gerrymandered Congressional Seat.



    That's why we cannot let this go.



    Hell no.



    No forgiving.



    And certainly no forgetting.



    We can move onto the general election, but no...I'm not feeling the ' Unity' bullshit.



    We learned lessons throughout all of this, and I believe Obama's people are smart enough to know that they can't trust her, or her lackeys -under any circumstances. You can pretend that you do, but he understands that these 2 Deranged Narcissists are his ENEMY...and wish him nothing but ill.
  • You guys are a very entertaining yet ignorant group of people.


    Obama knows that he will lose if he doesnt find a way to court Hillary's supporters. McCain is already after them. It seems that if you were really a group of progressives, you would try to get over yourselves and focus on what's good about Barack instead of what is so wrong with Hillary (who is not the real enemy mind you).



    Is this really a pro McCain website in disguise? With the purpose to stoke the fires of division within the ranks of progressives?
  • Re: The "Whitey" video.


    Why Does the Michelle Obama Rumor Tape Sound Like a 2006 Novel?



    Re: The Clintons? What Rikyrah said...
  • Okay, I'm confused. Why exactly should Hillary's website have a big picture of Obama on it if it's her website? Why is it an issue that her picture is the focal point of HER website? She endorsed Obama on her website and in her speech. I agree, she needs to do some damage control and a whole hell of a lot of work to help Obama's campaign to redeem herself. But that is just plain nitpicky and ridiculous. Be for real.
  • danielle-


    considering the Hillary crowd needed a few days to "adjust" to the fact that she lost (hence no immediate concession Tuesday night, like any other candidate), its sorta funny that Obama supporters the most offended by the racist crap thrown around are expected to Straighten Up and Fly Right immediately.



    Bitter Hillary Voters = Justified, Need A Few Weeks to Face Reality



    Bitter Obama Voters = Ignorant, so STFU About Hillary Right Now



    huh!



    ...if this kinda angry is still bubbling up a week or two from now, then yeah, people need to let it go.



    but i'd say the Statute of Limitations hasn't expired yet, especially since you could hear distinct booing when Hillary first mentioned Obama today during her speech. Will the real Progressives please stand up?
  • "You guys are a very entertaining yet ignorant group of people."


    We are neither entertaining or ignorant. If you have a different opinion then express that opinion. Please refrain from trying to denigrate people or question their intelligence.
  • karrie,


    IMO it matters because Hillary is considered untrustworthy. If she intends to "redeem" herself, then why not start now?



    Why is her goodwill always projected to some point in the future? Somehow, when we get to that point in time....it's extended even further. Goodwill deferred is no goodwill at all.



    Barack has a picture of her on his site, thanking her for the endorsement and inviting his supporters to write in with their thanks. Hillary only has text over a picture of her rally...it seems sloppy and insincere.



    Don't for one minute believe the smiling faces and assurances from Democrats on the talk shows. They are nervous as hell about Hillary's true intentions. The effusive praise she's received sounds like a hostage negotiation to my ear.



    I read that Hillary wanted Barack to agree to have the first ballot cast for her at the convention....she said it was for Chelsea... If she has accepted his victory, why all the stalling and bargaining? Why does Hillary consistently fall short?
  • "Is this really a pro McCain website in disguise? With the purpose to stoke the fires of division within the ranks of progressives?"


    I find it difficult to believe that you are seriously arguing that the Democratic party candidate who several weeks ago declared that she was supported by "hard working Americans, white Americans" belongs to the progressive cohort that you refer to? We all understand that we have to do business with Sr. Hillary and her acolytes but that does not mean that we have to trust or like them. And it certainly does not mean that we have to deny the reality of who they are and what they feel with respect to African Americans.



    We will continue to do what the Obama campaign needs us to do to support Senator Obama. He is in charge of his campaign but we are are free citizens of a democratic republic. Within the context of his campaign we will play by and obey his rules, but within the context of us exercising our rights as citizens we will speak and write freely as we please.



    As for Sr. Hillary and her acolytes, I refuse to fatten any frogs for snakes. You can do whatever you please.
  • I actually think that bitter Hillary supporters who want to support McCain or not vote in November at all are off their collective rocker.


    I do understand the point about maybe needing time to heal the wounds.



    I just don't think that Hillary bashing at this point is strategic or smart. Sorry if using the term ignorant is offensive, but it is beyond ignorant to think that Barack doesn't need Hillary to pound the pavement for him. It's nuts.
  • "Is this really a pro McCain website in disguise? With the purpose to stoke the fires of division within the ranks of progressives?"


    This is a black blog. That script doesn't really apply here.



    "instead of what is so wrong with Hillary (who is not the real enemy mind you)."



    Well, she actually is the enemy. She made herself the enemy. Yes, it is time to focus on the GE, but forgiving and forgetting? No.
  • Of course Hillary made a thousand mistakes and alienated the black community. I think this blog has done more than enough to point that out over the primary season. The bottom line is that Barack will need her voters to win.


    I don't exactly see Barack as the ride or die type for black issues anyway. Though I know you all think that is because he "transcends race" and "does what he needs to do" to win. I live in New York, and was dreadfully disturbed by his comments after the Sean Bell verdict. I hope that, with as much fervor as you all seem to support Sen. Obama's candidacy, that you call him to task when he is elected.



    Furthermore, when did being black automatically make you a progressive???
  • She didn't "make a mistake" in her race-baiting. It was a calculated campaign strategy. For all the reasons outlined by the commenters upthread, She can't be allowed to slide on it, and her losing the nomination is not punishment enough.
  • I live in New York, and was dreadfully disturbed by his comments after the Sean Bell verdict. I hope that, with as much fervor as you all seem to support Sen. Obama's candidacy, that you call him to task when he is elected.


    Danielle,



    I'm in New York too. We're you equally upset at New York Senator Hillary Clinton, who didn't say a word about the Sean Bell case?



    How about the Feb. 5 election where several mostly black districts came up with 0 votes for Obama (141 to 0 in Harlem!) We're you upset then?



    I think it is presumptuous and quite condescending of you (You guys are a very entertaining yet ignorant group of people.) to just waltz in here and assume that no one here will "call Obama to task when he is elected" as if we wouldn't understand how to do that when the time comes or already know Obama needs most of Hillary's voters to win.
  • "I don't exactly see Barack as the ride or die type for black issues anyway. Though I know you all think that is because he "transcends race" and "does what he needs to do" to win."


    Sister - this is not about Obama. We cannot allow any white politician, especially one who claims to be a Democrat and whose political career is owed to the black electorate, to play the race card and traffic in racially coded phrases. It is a mistake to conflate or attempt to bend our responses to the demands and needs of Obama's campaign. He is not running to be president of Black America. We have to look out for ourselves and remain vigilant.



    I don't find any fault with Obama and his campaign making peace with the Clintonians. That's part of what they have to do to win. When I am working as a volunteer in his campaign I will do my utmost to respect his wishes. Elsewhere, I will say and write what I please.
  • Cosign with every point about still being wary of the Clintons. They have provided MANY reasons to do so. Yes we will work together with any reasonable person to assist Obama in winning, but that does not checking our brain at the door, nor does it mean we don't have the right to make demands or set standards. I know the parable of the scorpion and the frog and will not be the frog to the Clinton's scorpion!
  • Danielle, I could have told you about this ignorant crowd. What really scares me is the fact that there are Hillary supporters who are just as ignorant and stupid enough not to support Obama, just as these morons would have not supported Clinton if she had won. It is up to people like you, and I to help win this election for the Democratic Party in November. Personally, I cannot stand Obama, but I realize that this election is bigger than any one man, or one women. We are in a shit load of trouble in this country, and I am ready to "get busy" working toward a Democratic Party victory in November. "let's roll!"
  • "Danielle, I could have told you about this ignorant crowd. What really scares me is the fact that there are Hillary supporters who are just as ignorant and stupid enough not to support Obama, just as these morons would have not supported Clinton if she had won. It is up to people like you, and I to help win this election for the Democratic Party in November."


    Just remember, Danielle, that any time you lay down with dogs you will always get up with fleas. Anybody who tells you on the one hand that it is important to elect a Democrat, nay, more important than anything to elect a Democrat while referring other people as "ignorant" and "morons" is a strange political bedfellow. Has it escaped your attention that none of us who disagree with you have called you any names or questioned your brain power?



    This "Anonymous" character wants you join with him or her to build a political party but fails to display any signs of having been raised in a home where good manners and civility were stressed. You don't need to join our side but beware of folks like "Anonymous." If you disagree with people like that they will cut off your head. That's no way to build a new world.
  • Thanks anonymous! A little bit of sanity and cool headed strategy will go a long way in the fall hopefully.


    I was going to ask how it could be that Barack is not running for pres of Black America, but that it is somehow a shame that Harlem didn't vote for him...but then I realized that I wouldn't get an answer that made sense.
  • PTCRUISER--


    What is ignorant (myopic, shortsighted, whatever adjective you might perfer) is the reluctance to work together, when we all clearly need each other to enact the change that we discuss.
  • Danielle,


    The question doesn't make sense. There is no president of Black America and if Obama didn't get any votes out of certain Harlem precincts it because of folks like "Anonymous" who despise him and feel that God appointed them to serve as gatekeepers for black folk. In short, somebody tampered with the machines and the roll of registered voters and it wasn't Obama and his supporters.
  • Maybe if I post this, they will see what they look like, and stop the divisive madness. I told these people about themselves earlier this week. They, like many found here, are total idiots. Victory in 08 my friend. Out!


    http://www.haloscan.com/comments/egalia/9108398914676216609/
  • "I was going to ask how it could be that Barack is not running for pres of Black America, but that it is somehow a shame that Harlem didn't vote for him"


    ...and she's calling other people ignorant?
  • "I was going to ask how it could be that Barack is not running for pres of Black America, but that it is somehow a shame that Harlem didn't vote for him"


    ...and she's calling other people ignorant?



    Exactly! What a joke...



    I guess she knows even more than her mayor Michael Bloomberg who actually stated that he believed that fraud was involved:



    Mike Claims Vote ‘Fraud’



    "If you want to call it significant undercounting, I guess that's a euphemism for fraud," said the mayor
  • Yes "she" is. Those votes were clearly re-counted for the official tally. Aside from the voter suppression claims, the implication is that blacks are supposed to vote unequivocally for Obama. That greatly contrasts with the earlier assertion that Obama is not "running for Pres of Black America."


    Anyway, he won! Stop whining and get him elected.
  • We won the nomination and we're still upset about how things went down. Imagine how the losers (Clintonites) are feeling. Then realize that we're ALL going to be losers, if we don't get on the same page.


    I'm less concerned with Obama's ability to foster inclusiveness than I am with our individual ability to push away potential supporters. As I've said in previous posts, follow Obama's lead.



    Be Magnanimous,

    Be Empathetic,

    Be Knowledgeable,

    B. Obama '08
  • So, what you're saying is that even though the showed zero votes for Obama, in order not to be seen as people who think that all blacks are supposed to vote for Obama, we were supposed to act as if he really didn't get any votes in Harlem? That makes no sense.


    Yes, he won, but as others have said here, it's not really about him, at least not totally. "Whining", huh? What game are you playing? Ostensibly, here to ask us to kiss the asses of white Clinton supporters for the greater good, not to mention let Clinton slide on the race-baiting strategy that was actually used against all of us, but you (and anonymous) can't resist insulting us in the process. Why is that?
  • "I'm less concerned with Obama's ability to foster inclusiveness than I am with our individual ability to push away potential supporters."


    Listen, if these people are Democrats, and they are so disturbed by Obama's successful run for the nomination that they intend to vote for McCain, I don't think there's much anyone can do to stop them, especially if they've made that decision based on being offended by what they heard or read someone an Obama supporter say, rather that based on what Obama himself has said They're irrational, and I doubt they can be brought around.
  • "What is ignorant (myopic, shortsighted, whatever adjective you might perfer) is the reluctance to work together, when we all clearly need each other to enact the change that we discuss."


    Please spare me, Danielle. You and "Anonymous" continue to claim that you want to work with people with whom you disagree but it is our fault if you call us ignorant and moronic. If you want to discuss our differences then go ahead but stop the name calling.
  • "I don't exactly see Barack as the ride or die type for black issues anyway."


    Well, we know Hillary wasn't riding or dying for black issues, so your argument is null and void.



    Basically you want us (black folk) to kiss your (white women) asses or you'll "withhold" your vote.



    If you're not going to vote for Barack Obama because of what black bloggers said, you weren't going to vote for him anyway. Let's stop this silly game.



    You are saying you won't vote for Obama unless YOU have the upper hand. Well guess what? You don't have the upper hand. If you did, Hillary would be the nominee, period.



    Hillary Clinton and her campaign and fanatical supporters did a LOT of damage and just because Hillary said "Um, ok, yeah, go Barack. Ok." does not mean she and her crew gets let off the hook.



    You cannot tell me that Barack Obama did not get not even ONE vote in Harlem. I betcha if you went back and looked at the results from the 2000 and 2004 elections George Bush got at least 1 vote. So we know that Clinton and her gang were riding dirty in Harlem.



    Personally I expect B. Clinton to move his office out of Harlem b/c he didn't want to be there in the first place. It was just cheaper. Time will tell.





    At any rate, what Hillary and her gang did was damaging not only to black politicians on the rise, but any non-white, non-straight and non-right kind of Christian candidate.



    How many black politicians are now wondering if their churches are liabilities? It's only a matter of time before a black politician running in a non-black district is asked why they are going to a BLACK church anyway?



    Look at all the speculation on whether or not Obama was Muslim or not. Somewhere, there's a young American who is Muslim who just reconsidered serving his community because of the anti-Muslim attitude going on.



    I personally believe the race baiting is what made Bill Richardson run away from the Clintons, because if they're pulling that race game on Obama, they would pull it on him, too. Look at how much more publically nasty the Clinton crew was to Richardson when he defected, than when whites like Robert Reich defected. Don't think that wasn't noticed by non-black minorities, either.



    So it can't be forgotten, because Hillary and them were literally trying to put non-white candidates in the back of the bus. And if you're a Hillary supporter and think, "well that's just politics, live with it," remember, that playbook could be used against women, too.



    Any Hillary supporter who comes on a pro-black, pro-Obama blog with an attitude is just trying to get justification why they shouldn't vote for Obama. I say "woman up" and just don't vote for Obama. I'm not voting for McCain and I'm not in emotional distress or doing mental backflips trying to force myself to vote for McCain; I'm just not.



    Anyone who claims "that blog was mean to me and so I'm not voting for X," wasn't going to vote for that candidate anyway, so cut the games.
  • I believe that Obama and his staff are smart enough to know that the Clintons can't be trusted. They fell into that race-baiting far too easily for my comfort, and her smug attitude and the former president's nasty comments can't be ignored. So yes, accept her help, but definitely keep an eye on her and her subordinates at all times.


    And you guys really should not feed the trolls. I've been lurking for a while, and what I've seen is about as far from ignorant as Hillary has been from being gracious.
  • Jill,


    She had a hard time saying Barack's name because for most of the primary she called him "my opponent" refusing to say his name.



    Here's what I know:



    If he puts her on his ticket, he will lose. For sure.



    If he doesn't put her on his ticket, her "acolytes" will do everything in their power to make sure he loses. They are already making that crystal clear and nothing she said yesterday is going to change that.



    This is what we must do:



    Get To Work to Make Sure He Wins
  • to let it go or not to let it go? that is the question. or maybe to forgive and forget or to forgive and not forget? what serves our interests best? if the begalas of the world don't get it, they never will. we have won. obama will become president. his strategy is not to press the issue of clinton's ugliness. the post mortems on her campaign are not as scathing as we might like but they don't deny her defeat. they all acknowledge obama's strength as a candidate. let's try to accentuate this positive. get as many clinton voters on board as possible. eyes on the prize. forgive but maybe not forget. how's that?
  • and obviously she will not be the running mate.
  • Let it go already!!! He won. The Clintons go back to New York or wherever with their tails between their legs. For folks to hold onto the Clintons' behavior gives them too much power.


    The Clintons use of racial polarization is nothing new and for folks to hold so much hatred for them indicates to me that they feel that their hope is in the Clintons' hands. You're holding too much disdain for someone who lost. You should fee sorry for them.
  • I don't care what she tries to say now, after the fact, some words & actions, you just can't take back. It's too late for her to try to get on board now. And you know that she's only doing it because the rest of the party has come down on her like a ton of bricks for being such a poor loser. Her speech rang insincere to me, I can't stand her or her husband now. They can go to hell. And I hope, that we, as a people, don't just re-embrace their sorry behinds with open arms. Because they totally sold us out during this campaign ya'll. So she can go boo-hoo to all her "hard-working White American" voters & let's see if they'll be enough to re-elect her ass back to the Senate. We should let the Clintons see the true political folly they committed by discounting our vote & our love we'd had for them for so long. Fuck her! I'll never support anything Billary does again. Ever.
  • To Anonymous, did you say to just "let it go"?! Like it's all okay now?! After this chick has divided the Democratic party into all these different sections, maybe even permanently?


    Dude, I don't think so. These people have put a festering sore on the Democratic party that I can only pray will heal in time for November.



    Here's where your little theory is wrong: We, as citizens, as voters, have a right to demand two important things from our politicians, Accountability & Clarity (I bit this from Arianna Huffington, just saw her speak about a month & a half ago). So, that means, you should hold your candidate Accountable for what they say, how they behave, run their campaign, represent you while in office, etc. And when they're not conducting themselves in a way that you consider acceptable, you hold them responsible for their actions or inaction, not accept excuses. Secondly, if they're doing something that you may not quite understand or agree with, you should demand clarity from them on how they're addressing issues. If you're not clear on how or why they're going about something from a particular angle, you ask them to explain themselves. Make them CLARIFY. Only then, can you make an informed decision on whether or not the person is still worthy of your support or vote. And you know what? The way Hilary Clinton ran her campaign doesn't stand up to either my accountability or clarity tests, she can't possibly give a satisfactory response to justify some of the hatred that she delibrately injected into this contest.



    In other words, you don't just give people a free pass on shit when they've behaved horribly, especially the way this woman has gone about it. This was one of the nastiest campaigns in Democratic history. Her behavior was unconscionable & if I was Barack, she'd never hold any position in my Cabinet. She has no integrity, it's horrible. She cannot be trusted. She's proven it.



    And you say we should feel sorry for them? What?! You're funny...



    I will say though, that here in Los Angeles, I've been an active Obama volunteer, & I am willing to work with any former Clinton supporters in order to defeat McCain in November. I don't really hold a grudge against most of her supporters in the same way I hold HRC responsible.



    So, while yeah, the bigger picture is important, I don't think anyone that's expressing ill will towards the Clintons, is saying that they won't work with some of her supporters in order to drum up support for Barack in the fall.



    We just saying we ain't about to play Step n Fetch It while we're at it, stroking egos & catering to hurt feelings and what not.



    I'll work with anyone in order for the common goal of an Obama victory, independents, Obama-cans, Clinton supporters, come one, come all. But leave the bitterness at home, because we don't have time for it.



    Let's get a Dem back in the White House ya'll. GO OBAMA!!!
  • flygyrl, i don't think easing clinton voters away from her is the same as giving a free pass to billary for their ugliness. so don't lose your anger. i suggest putting it in the closet for now. bring it out when she is up for reelection by mounting a challenge to her in the party primary as per ned lamont/lieberman.
  • Town,


    Look at you! Just putting it down!



    I love it! Preach it!



    hahahahahahahahaha
  • As divisive as the Clintons were it did not work! I will give Obama credit for his view that thing are not static - at least in this situation. If it had been a diffrent election cycle or a few years ago it would have derailed his campaign. Some of the Clinton voters get it though I will never understand how someone remained a supporter considering all of the deplorable things they did. Had Obama used similar tactics I would not have let it slide. Clinton did more damage than any Republican simply because it was assumed that they were 'bad' and Democrats are 'good'. Now that all pretenses are gone, all prejudices have been revealed, Black people can take comfort in knowing where we stand, how our loyalty has been viewed and think about the value we place in giving our loyalty without conditions. From this point forward we need to give serious consideration to our future, exercising political acumen and strategy and how will we implement that. Black women especially need to do so because the focus is still on wooing older white female voters or on whether sexism dominated the campaign with no serious discussion about the impact of how it was used by by some white women to subjugate Black women. Since 6 out of 10 Black voters are women our contribution to securing the nomination for Obama should receive the proper acknowledgment and we should be thinking about how we want this to benefit us in meeting our needs and not be taken for granted.
  • What the Clinton's failed to realize
    is that they needed to treat the black base with white kid gloves just

    as Obama treated Hillary and her supporters. Their failure to do this

    has brought about her negative legacy.
  • Amen, Jelana, amen. Although this point is never mentioned by the mainstream, even by black reporters and columnists, black folks were aware of its importance and they did not care for being slighted and taken for granted.
  • Yeah, it wasn't the part the Clintons played in the promulgation of many policies that screwed over Black people not only in Urban America, but in other parts of the world such as the Caribbean and Africa, it was when they said some mean things to Obama.


    This is why I have always been a skeptic of Black Bougie people, they only think about themselves and will pretend that their intrests represents the Black collective when it clearly doesn't.
  • tlw,


    You are making an assumption which is really not true. I disapprove of many of their policies, not only abroad, but in the US as well. They created policies which definitely did not benefit Black America but unfortunately many here in the US don't realize that. I was making a general statement as to why they lost the Black vote here. Most of the people on this blog already understand the Clinton's negative policies.
  • I haven't read all of the posts in their entirety so I'll just add my two cents and you can do with it what you will.


    As a person of color and participant of this year's democratic party's election I am left feeling injured. Many people are not going to care about this at all and many people will know what I mean. If you don't care about this then stop reading now and go about your life.



    I got engaged in this election early on and have donated time, money, and effort to Obama's campaign. I did this for the similar reasons that Clinton's supporters did. I was running towards change, disheartened by the state of our nation, war, and the failing economy. I am truly invested in living in a nation I am proud of. So I know what Michelle was talking about- screw the pomp and circumstance. Again, I wasn't working against Hillary, I was working for Barrack. Like many I was familiar with the Clinton's brand and their great track of effort working for people of color. [In retrospect, I'll need to look into this some more because it is hard to believe now...]



    The media attention on Hillary and the hurt and disappointment of her constituency has left me angry. Most of the pain that I feel is what her process did to the election, to our nominee, and to the country. Hillary Clinton and her surrogates injected racial and gender divisiveness intentionally and in the worst possible ways. The high road was a path never taken by the Clinton campaign, as it was the low road they expected to win on. Once it was clear that Obama was not going to misstep, at least not as often as Hillary Clinton, they endeavored to throw salt into national wounds by pitting men against women, whites against everyone else. She had a number of times to affirm her values on race and racism, and she resisted showing her leadership- because the open wound helped her favorables. If anyone should have shown leadership, it was SHE with all of her experience. She the role model. She a former first lady. She a Senator. What did the little girls learn after watching this primary? Gender trumps race, and apparently no one experiences these issues as much as white women. Puhlease.



    Sexism helped her in numerous ways. What would have happened if Obama had that tearful moment in New Hampshire? Our sexist cultural norms would have everyone call him soft and not capable of leading a nation. Through the same sexist lens Clinton Feminists saw that as a moment where her truth emerged- an enlightened, benevolent leader. Yeah I didn't see her screaming HEY THAT WAS SEXIST!!!! In fact when Obama responded to the personal attacks she proclaimed, “If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen” even though she regularly complains about the heat…



    Now the primary is over, her people are pissed but they were not the ones ATTACKED by the Obama campaign, MSM yes- Obama, no. Obama and his constituents WERE ATTACKED by the Clintons, MSM, and their supporters. We were called idealists, stupid, naive, then in the same breath academics, cult like, or racist for wanting to see someone other than a white person win the white house. Anyone wanted to see the role of position evolve were thought of as ridiculous saps that know nothing of the importance… Apparently Barrack couldn’t field a 3am phone call but Hillary was talking loopy at 11pm. Supposedly, black people only voted for him because of race- erasing any possibility that there are intelligent people of color who also see his merits, not to mention white people, her peers, who said NO to the Hillary. White women however, never got polled about voting because of Hillary’s gender…



    This is not to say Hillary was not mistreated by the media, but her history in this country, especially having to do to with the Clinton machine, campaign strategy, and professional style has made a long list of enemies- Barrack had NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT. She did NOT walk in with a clean slate. But instead of elevating the issues, like Obama did with his speech on race, she did nothing. She blamed, she deflected, she lied, and she did not apologize.



    Now there are all these white women- sorry but I have to say it. I can say "women," but frankly we live in a racial divided country whether white people recognize it or not. Whites have the privilege of being invisible, regarded the standard that every non white is compared to, so when the media says women they mean WHITE women. Racial groups are apparently not gendered, so I will claim my own groups- Latina and female. WHITE WOMEN are upset, now here we go... let's draw all of our attention on them, their needs, their desires, their dreams, and their feelings and to hell with what I need.



    Aside from needing a real leader in the White House, I need white women to acknowledge that their fight resulted in stepping on- scratch that- TRAMPLING on people of color, including women of color in order to have their say. I'm not saying that they shouldn't have had their say, because they should. What I am saying is that right now I am so ANGRY because white women, ruffed me up for a year and now you want Barrack Obama to apologize to you? Kiss your ass for your vote? I should try and win you? You get the covers of magazines, the benefit of the standard of beauty, and everything else and I should what? Try and get you to vote for YOUR ISSUES?



    In recent history there have been a number of moments where whites and people of color (and people with critical consciousness on race in the AmeriKKKa) have our racial truths emerge NATIONALLY as a sick country. The OJ Simpson trial comes to mind, and now we have another moment where blacks and whites sit on opposite sides of the fence. With this moment in time however, my beef is SPECIFICALLY with white women.



    They- WHITE WOMEN'S RACISM aka WHITE FEMINISM has picked a wound we were all too polite to pay any attention to since the 70s. And this wound will forever, I fear, disable our capacity to work together. The fight and the struggle of so many feminists of color were the histories that impacted my view of my own power as a woman. It was what I had to read to recognize that my culture does not always fall in sync with white America, and that’s ok I’m still a feminist. Over this last year, I actually feel what women whom I see as she-roes experienced- white women not giving a shit about us. It's about their lives, their experiences, their dreams, and their desires- in tact and without regard for other's struggles despite the fact that they run congruently or parallel to theirs. Forget about we. On the road Hillary was saying me first, party second. White feminists were saying- white women first and the hell with the rest, including women of color.



    For you people who are saying that we should get over it, I have to say respectfully. FUCK YOU. My silence for so long allowed you to believe you can dominate me. Our country is where it is because of the countless number of times you completely disregarded my people's needs, dreams, and will. True feminism invokes dialogue but you didn’t want to dialogue- you wanted a Hillary Clinton fight.



    I want an apology for the dirty fight, the selfish fight, the racist fight that Hillary Clinton and her supporters waged. Every time a Clinton feminist joined in on Reverend Wright racism, you said I don’t have respect for sisters of color. Hit the WIKI for 49 others reasons… and give me some more time, I’ll think of some more reasons in addition to that. You all owe ME an apology.



    I could care less about your individual votes. I will work with you on this election because it is bigger than just me, but I need to heal too. Let me just say that a Presidential win will not be enough to get over this beef.
  • "For you people who are saying that we should get over it, I have to say respectfully. FUCK YOU. My silence for so long allowed you to believe you can dominate me. Our country is where it is because of the countless number of times you completely disregarded my people's needs, dreams, and will. True feminism invokes dialogue but you didn’t want to dialogue- you wanted a Hillary Clinton fight."


    I really feel sorry for you. God bless you lady.
  • evita evita,


    You rock!



    hahahahahahahahaha
  • Evita,


    The only change I would make to your statement is that RACE always trumps

    gender. WHITE is actually the key.

    They are hiding behind feminism and sexism but the fact that they are WHITE means they are entitled. We all deserve an apology but that will not be forthcoming any time in the near future.
  • The way I look at it, focusing on South Carolina takes power away from blacks ... and whites. Refusing to recognize the significance of Iowa takes power away from whites, and blacks.


    Focusing on South Carolina is an attempt at turning blacks into selfish people who only care about themselves and personal attacks towards them -- top down.



    To focus on Iowa would be to acknowledge how Obama touched ordinary whites, and how ordinary whites changed blacks' minds -- bottom up.



    Some people don't want to give up top-down thinking, the old politics , the old identity divisions. They want to make smaller white support of Obama and make larger black support of Obama, so that ultimately the Clintons fuck-ups become not only center stage but a simple matter of speaking in a way in which they were misunderstood. That's what the insistence on South Carolina means to me.
  • Jelana-


    I don't disagree with you, but that was the lesson that white girls learned. People of color learned a different lesson from this moment in history.
Please login to comment.
Returning? Login