DISQUS

Jack and Jill Politics: Why Biden’s Racist Behind Ain’t Gonna Be VP

  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    "Just think of the narratives we've heard so far. . . If he picks Sebelius or McCaskill he's betraying Hillary supporters."

    -Fuck Hillary Clinton.
    Fuck PUMA.
  • KC · 1 year ago
    So Biden's a racist for his Dunkin Donuts comment but Hillary's abstained after quoting Gandhi and saying he worked at a gas station? How about how racist Hillary's campaign was against Obama, where her supporters wouldn't stop labeling him an "undeserving black man"?

    Hillary supporters need to grow up. GROW UP!
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    Is he still crying about Hillary? Presidents need to know how to move forward and focus on the task at hand. Oh yeah...he's the most Liberal Senator in the country...no chance of that. See ya in November for the "I got drilled and didn't see it coming" speech. Now thats change we can believe in.
  • Teresa · 1 year ago
    please show me one quote where anyone called him an undeserving black man.
  • Tracey · 1 year ago
    actually there is tv footage of a woman from New York who is a Hillary supporter who outrights calls Obama an undeserving black man. People asked her to be quiet and she said flat outright that she would not be quiet. This tv footage is legitmate as it comes, I was watching in my hotel room while in the nation's capital.
  • B-Serious · 1 year ago
    Ed Schultz had a very good point yesterday. The standard being set for Obama's veep choice (both by the msm media and the netroots) is unrealistic. Meaning, that no matter who Obama picks, some group's going to be able to protest the decision as a "betrayal" of Obama's message.

    Just think of the narratives we've heard so far. . . If he picks Sebelius or McCaskill he's betraying Hillary supporters. If he picks Richardson, he's snubbing Bill Clinton. If he picks Webb, he'll have to answer for soft-core porn novels and past charges of sexism. Nunn brings potential problems with the gay community. Bayh championed the Iraq invasion. Kaine is too inexperienced to partner with Obama. Reed is an unknown, boring guy. Biden sticks his foot in his mouth sometimes. Clinton (hell no!). Wesly Clark is a former Clintonista whose comments put Obama in a tough bind. Kerry already had his chance.

    I mean, the guy is screwed no matter who he picks. To be honest, the only pick that would give me trouble would be Clinton.

    Schultz basically told his audience he's going to be a team player (all positive) once Obama makes his choice (though he draws the line at picking a Republican). He's not going to suspend all critical thinking, but he is going to recognize the fact that, at the end of the day, someone WILL win and someone WILL lose . . . and the ONLY way we don't lose is if we support our ticket with full strength. I think he's right. Politics is the definition of compromise. We need team players and positive energy coming out of this convention. Because the GOP, PUMA, Too black crowd, Not black enough crowd . . . all of them will be more than happy to capitalize off of the slightest bit of division that they see.
  • Micheline · 1 year ago
    Co-sign
  • RonnieB · 1 year ago
    Biden's many Archie Bunker-esque gaffes aside, he's someone that would be too big of a distraction. The press would be in a constant frenzy to get a quote from him, and that's not good for Obama--who's trying to change the way D.C. does business.

    I hate to give the press all that power, but until we change that institution, our political leaders will always be secondary.
  • B-Serious · 1 year ago
    You're right, he could be a big distraction.

    Still, I'd like Obama to pick a "fighter." In many ways, that's Biden's biggest draw and curse. He's loose-lipped, but you gotta like a Democrat whose willing to call the President's attacks, "bullsh*t." I just don't want a weak ticket.

    I still like the idea of John Kerry as a dark-horse. I'm thinking he might have learned how to fight over the past four years. Think of it . . . that experience has probably haunted him since 2004. Talk about poetic justice. Plus, I've never liked the idea that Democrats throw their candidates away after one try.

    But, as I said in an earlier post, an Obama/Kerry ticket would require FULL party support because Rush Limbaugh et. al would have a field day dusting off their old Kerry smears.
  • Francis L. Holland · 1 year ago
    Is Biden REALLY the best that American has to offer for a vice president, or is his just another white man, and that's what would put him at the front of the list. Having knowledge of national security isn't very helpful if everything that comes out of your mouth is insulting and embarrassing to the US and to international constituencies.

    One advantage of nominating Biden is that it would show white people that Obama doesn't hold a grudge against whites who have specifically insulted Obama based on his skin color, i.e. by calling him "eloquent" and "clean". Nominating Biden shows that Obama has gotten over that, and can get over most any insult.

    Well, that's certainly an advantage in the United States, but I don't think it worth giving him the vice presidency, just to prove Obama has thick skin.

    Obama should nominate Bill Richardson, who speaks fluent Spanish, spent like half a dozen terms in the US Congress representing a Latinos state, and was Ambassador to the UN as well as a Secretary in the Clinton Administration. THAT's experience and bringing something to the table.

    Obama should NOT pick ANY v.p. candidate simply because that person is a white man, anymore than Obama himself should refuse the nomination because Obama himself is not a white man. Being a white man is no longer a threshold qualification for the presidency or the vice presidency.
  • cheryl aka jill tubman · 1 year ago
    Agreed on all points. A black-brown ticket might be a tough sell though which is too bad because I really like Richardson.
  • AnthonyMason · 1 year ago
    As I keep hearing Biden's name popping up all over the place, I'm certain that the first things that'll come out of my mouth is he's nominated as VP will be: WTF?! As of right now, my choices are Al gore and Wes Clark. Unfortunately, Clark has been pushed off the radar by Obama. I do not like any one of the choices being put out there with the exception of Kaine and the governor of one of the western states (i think his last name is schwizer or something like that.).
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    I call him Governor Cowboy, and I like him too.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    Now Schweitzer I can respect.

    Once in a while, Montana produces something or someone worth the skin on their lips.
  • The Caped Composer · 1 year ago
    Hell YES!!!! I'm hoping, deep down, that Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer will be the out-of-left-field VP pick that no one anticipated. He has all the right similarities to Obama, AND all the right contrasts. And he's the second-best orator in the Party-- second only to Obama himself. Schweitzer, being rural, white, pro-gun, and Catholic, will be able to make inroads with Obama's most challenging demographic. People say, "But Montana only has three electoral votes," but they don't realize that Schweitzer is a great communicator, and his message would resonate with the working-class voters of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Wisconsin. His independent streak would resonate well in New Hampshire and Maine, and, of course, his familiarity with energy issues would give the ticket a huge advantage in Western states such as Colorado and Nevada. I'm hoping the Obama campaign has been savvy enough to realize that Schweitzer is the absolute best pick for VP.
  • Lilytiger · 1 year ago
    I think the West is the new South. We are getting numbers people!
    But he has only been a governor for a short while. I have floated his name out there on other sites and that is the biggest response. I love what he has done with environmental issues. He doesn't forget that people need to work, too. So he is no tree hugger but he has an awesome background. He has worked in North Africa and the Middle East and speaks Arabic. His work was agricultural and not petroleum.
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    The VP has to be someone Obama is comfortable with, in my opinion.
    I don't think Biden is that person.
  • Liza · 1 year ago
    Whoa!

    See I wasn't aware of all this. Well I guess this means it will be Bayh. Damn that means Harold Ford wins.
  • CraigHickman · 1 year ago
    Maybe it will be Wesley Clark, as so many have suggested.

    If he chooses Kaine, it will be a bold choice.
  • Liza · 1 year ago
    I just don't want the dark sith to have ANY connections to an O administration.
  • mneezy1 · 1 year ago
    Wesley Clark would be a fine choice for VP.
  • isonprize · 1 year ago
    My choice for Obama's VP

    Gen. Anthony Zinni (USMC, ret.)
  • nctodc · 1 year ago
    You've clearly never seen Clark campaign. He's awful at it.
  • CraigHickman · 1 year ago
    Wow. I had no idea. I pay no attention to Joseph Biden, Jr.
  • cheryl aka jill tubman · 1 year ago
    Yeah, putting them all together is pretty appalling. those pointing to Biden as VP either don't know his record or are winking at his record. It's not just one "stumble". You can bet the GOP would have a field day with all of this, right? And how would it make Obama look?
  • taritac · 1 year ago
    Sigh. I was really rooting for Biden, too. He is just as crazy as McCain-- in a good way-- but can really talk coherently about foreign policy.

    Obama needs a Darth Cheney backing him up. Bayh and Kaine are too like him. He needs someone who can play dirty. So far that only leaves Hillary Clinton, and we ain't haaaaaavin' that!
  • NMP · 1 year ago
    I hear where you're coming from, and I have the same emotional reaction to Hillary Clinton, but unfortunately Senator Obama and his team have run such an ineffectual campaign since late spring that it may be impossible not to pick Hillary Clinton--if he wants to win.

    I'm loathe to agree with anything Taylor Marsh says, but she asks a legitimate question today, does anyone know what the Obama Campaign's theme or message is? Specifically, a compelling case for an Obama presidency and against a McCain presidency?

    I know, I know, I've been one of the loudest voices screaming to stop the hand wringing and worrying about the tightening polls. But that was when I trusted the Campaign had a plan; however, after his performance at Saddleback, I'm now convinced that not only does this Campaign not have a plan, they may not have a clue.

    As scary as John McCain's answer was on evil, it doesn't begin to compare to the heartbreak I felt listening to Senator Obama's answers on abortion and why he wanted to be President. It was the first time I found myself asking, does he really want this?

    Senator Obama's only chance of winning lies with choosing a candidate that is a:

    1. Fighter
    2. Can sure up the female vote
    3. Trusted on both the economy AND foreign relations
    4. Elicits feelings that he/she earned it/waited their turn

    The last may be the most important. When voters say he's inexperienced, I think many mean he didn't wait his turn, and he hasn't earned it. That's the advantage John McCain has, not the number of years in public service. I think Senator Obama would be forgiven for his lack of "experience" if his command of the issues on stage during debates and forums matched the hype of a once in a lifetime politician. Unfortunately, his appearances do just the opposite: creating second thoughts and doubts. Personally, I could have forgiven a bad performance on Saturday to fatigue or illness, but it clearly was a lack of preparedness. After 18 months of campaigning and 20 or more debates, Senator Obama and his team still don't seem to understand the importance of them. Just like Senator Clinton, John McCain has been enduring the rigors of debate boot camp. Clearly, Senator Obama hasn't. God forgive me for my choice of words, but that laziness and stubborness sealed the deal for Hillary Clinton as VP.
  • Micheline · 1 year ago
    I still think that he has a plan but I completely agree with you with what you said. If his debate performance was on the same level as Hillary he would have finished her off quickly. But because he is not a very good debater people are left with the impression that he's not experienced. Look at John Edwards, he has held less electoral experience than Obama but because he is a very debater, one gets the impression that he knows his stuff. He didn't do badly at the gathering but he is not a good off the cuff speaker. He stammers and says a lot ahs and ums. The stammering is distracting that it is very hard to understand what he is saying.
  • NMP · 1 year ago
    "He stammers and says a lot ahs and ums. The stammering is distracting that it is very hard to understand what he is saying."

    Something that could have EASILY AND QUICKLY been corrected by a speech therapist and public speaking coach. For the life of me, I do not understand why it has not been corrected. Public speaking is not a talent; it's a finely developed skill. His senior strategists and communications heads get paid VERY WELL to deal with this, and they haven't. So what does that tell you?
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    This "way' ain't good for us.

    And no, we need no more Darth Cheney. We just need someone who's going to have Obama's back and fire back on McSame and his supporters who malign his citizenship and his 'ambition.'
  • msmartin · 1 year ago
    Me either Craig.
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    Looks like someone was talking to Biden as a kid, too much. He's got way too many "lyrics" for his own good.

    That racism is the refusal to take ownership of blacks as true Americans. He talks like black kids are somebody else's problem.
  • Town · 1 year ago
    Biden likes to run his yap too much and he would stray off message. Obama would have a tough time reeling Biden in. If he wants to deal with that drama, he may as well pick Hillary.

    Bayh is a Billary. For some reason he reminds me of Dan Quayle.

    Kaine wants to be VP so bad he can taste it, but Obama's chances in VA are better hitching his horse to Warner's wagon than Kaine's. Picking Kaine ain't gonna make Virginians say "Oh, yeah! Let's vote Obama!" That's just not going to happen. Campaigning in conjunction with Mark Warner's Senate race WILL. Kaine just needs to sit down and figure out how he's going to become the next president of VCU. The timing would be right for Kaine since the current president leaves in 2010 and Kaine's term is up in 2010.

    It seems as though Obama's inner circle is filled with wonky white dudes. I just feel like his VP pick will be another wonky white dude. If he chooses a woman, she's got to be stellar to avoid unfair comparisons to Hillary...even Hillary would have to bow down.

    For some reason, I keep coming back to Al Gore or someone along those line. I don't think Al Gore would want to be VP again, though.
  • JunePearl · 1 year ago
    Yes! That is the perfect way to describe Bayh! I couldn't put my finger on it, but Dan Quayle is the best comparison.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    Can you imagine if Obama picked Gore? The Rethugs and Billary would shyte on themselves.
  • Town · 1 year ago
    Imagine...one hour before the VP speech at the convention...everyone still doesn't know who the VP is...then you hear "blip" on your cell phone. You check it, the letters G-O-R-E are on your phone. You go "OMG! WHUT?!"

    You call your friends and say "OMG he picked AL GORE, turn on the convention!" Tim Kaine or whoever is introducing the VP (half the people at the convention still don't know b/c they didn't sign up) and out comes Al Gore.

    The only way McBane can top that is to pick Hillary. LOL
  • D. · 1 year ago
    Didn't Gore already rule himself out?

    And stop giving away my points.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    Al--it's been alleged--wants out of anything regarding the campaign.
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    Ok...now for devil's advocate time...

    Do you think Biden could just be really coarse?

    Maybe he's one of those guys guys who grab their crotches, and spit, and shoot from the hip, and don't understand things like emotions and girls and sensitivity.

    Maybe he's one of those men who hit on women so crudely, all you can do is laugh at them.

    Maybe he's a guy with one chest of drawers with a single hairbrush and a bottle of Old Spice. Maybe he says stupid things and makes off colour jokes but when push comes to shove, he might surprise you, and be a decent human being deep down.

    Or, maybe he's really just a racist jerk.
  • cheryl aka jill tubman · 1 year ago
    Yeah -- maybe he's just a racist jerk.
  • JunePearl · 1 year ago
    It just dawned on me that this VP is going to have to be a special person in order to be impressive.

    Let me clarify that a bit.

    Obama's appeal from his supporters mostly stems from his diverse experiences. Every other news source keeps harping on his race, but that's a story for another day... and we all know how MSM does *insert eye roll here*. In any case, no matter if you are liberal, or progressive, or even a bit libertarian, he as a facet of his profile that is appealing. He has been masterful at maneuvering that fine line. (Although lately his tactics have been called to question, and I personally think that it is his campaign/PR people have been faltering. The brilliance of the primary campaign is missing). In that way, the VP pick is going to be seen as a weak, "safe", or bland unless s/he brings this diverse array experiences as well. It is with that view that I think any VP who is not "special" is going to be seen as a let-down.

    That being said, why has no one talked about an Obama/Richardson ticket?!?! I've been saying that since day one. Is that too many "colored people" for America to handle? Has Richardson out-right said "Do Not Pick Me"? I’m sorry if that’s already been talked about here at JJP, I’m new :)
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    1. America couldn't handle a Black/Brown ticket
    2. The rumors have been crazy from day one - he has ' women' problems.
  • msmartin · 1 year ago
    rikyrah, I agree. They woud go ape-shit crazy.
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Unfortunately, you are correct. The thing is, from the moment that it was rumored that Obama would run, the first person that came to mind as a running mate was Richardson. I had all sorts of electoral college fantasies with their combination. But, America isn't ready and couldn't cope.
  • JunePearl · 1 year ago
    What is up with all of these politicians?! They want to grab all this power, but seem to be powerless in keep their legs closed! Come on! In fact, that is one thing that appeals to me about Obama, he seems determined to do right by his wife and children. Absolutely determined not to let those kids down as a father. If he ever gets caught in a cheating scandal, I have a feeling the Black community is going to be harder on him than anyone else. We may have forgiven Clinton for it, but Obama is a whole 'nother case...hmmm, that whole comparison thing would be a good post...hint, hint, lol!
  • Leota2 · 1 year ago
    Richardson has a--shall we say, a many varied female problem . . .
    And---it's way too many brown people for this damned country.
  • Lilytiger · 1 year ago
    He's Judas, didn't you hear?


    LOL
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Thanks Jill for the 4-1-1.

    I'm the one who always says follow the pattern, and you did. Very informative.
  • jackjillpolitics=dumb · 1 year ago
    if you google mccain and racism you get 3,080,000 hits
    if you google jack jill politics and racism, you get 75,000 hits

    stupid argument
  • msmartin · 1 year ago
    Yet you're here - arguing.
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    They even registered an insulting user name. That's dedication.
  • Town · 1 year ago
    100 points for you....no, 150 for working overtime.
  • ProudBidenSupporter · 1 year ago
    Biden already addressed these criticisms during one of the primary debates:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnG2B5bbkBE

    Obama:
    "I have absolutely no doubt about what is in his heart and the commitment that he has made to racial equality in this country."
  • Lilytiger · 1 year ago
    So Claire is definately out of the running? She would bring in the bell weather state.

    Hope, hope ,hope.
  • isonprize · 1 year ago
    Except the "Hillary-is-the-only-viable-woman" crowd would have a coronary (not that I care, mind you...).

    Same thing would happen if Sen. Obama picked Gov. Janet Napolitano. Which I personally would LOVE, if for no other reason than to stick a pin in Sen. McCain's eye, as she is the governor of Arizona.
  • Lilytiger · 1 year ago
    Well that would be one way to get rid of them for good. :-)
  • Town · 1 year ago
    That's why if Obama picks a woman,she's got to be someone that even Hillary would have to bow down to.
  • John Manifold · 1 year ago
    Biden is the farthest thing from a racist in the US Senate. Anyone who asserts otherwise is either a GOP concern troll or highly uninformed. The "articulate ... clean" bit was ridiculously overblown. O is many things, articulate being one of them. His politics are notably clean, with additional points for having come from Cook County.

    And if you're looking for someone with whom O is comfortable, Biden fits the bill. Almost every one of the 300-plus men and women who have served in the US Senate since 1973 have felt very close to Joe Biden.

    Biden's ethics are nonpareil. He has been a practical, results-driven liberal for 35 years. Yes, there are votes he [and I] wish he could do over, but he stopped Bork and did many other good things in Judiciary. In foreign policy, Joe knows [like "Bo knows"]. The sonofagun can bond with the heart of voters like few in public life, and no one battles better in debates.
  • heartsandflowers · 1 year ago
    Nobody said he didn't do his job with some merit, but that doesn't change the fact he would be a big mistake as VP. The problem is that you don't agree and are belittling people who have valid grievances and denying the issues. That's like excusing away a neighbor who molested you because he left you money in his will. Strom Thurman having a child with a Black woman didn't lessen his racism.
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    He stopped Bjork?
  • Micheline · 1 year ago
    Robert Bork
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    Hehe.

    Thanks Micheline...I hated that swan dress.
  • ultramagnetic · 1 year ago
    I'm from Delaware and Biden isn't a racist. He can be a bit of a thick d*ckhead with some of the stuff he says but he's no racist. My parents worked on one of his early campaigns, My sister worked for him and I've worked on a couple of his campaigns. He has been one of Delaware's Best Advocates and one of the Best Advocates for blacks in our state. He gets overwhelming support from both Republicans and Democrats in this state. And this is state with a 20% percent black population.

    He suffers from Mind to Mouth disease. He rarely edits himself when he speaks. For all his years in DC he doesn't live in DC. He commutes every day and IF a local organization needs him to come to an event its a quick phone call or just walk into one of his county offices and 9 time out of 10 you'll get him. Last election we made his son Beau the State's AG. More than likely if Biden were to be picked for VP, Beau would probably get nominated to fill his seat.
  • nctodc · 1 year ago
    Joe Biden is not a racist.

    You can cherrypick clips of his inartful, foot-in-mouth statements and make it look like he is, but that doesn't make it so. As Obama testified in the Des Moines Register debate, "I've seen his leadership. I have absolutely no doubt about what is in his heart and the commitment that he's made with respect to racial equality in this country."

    The fact is, if there was a Republican who had a record like Joe Biden's on civil rights, my response would be exactly the same: he's not a racist.

    While I think Obama could do better (Sebelius, ftw!), Biden is, without a doubt, the best of the oft-discussed VP candidates and I'd be proud to do my part to ensure their election.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    The fact is, if there was a Republican who had a record like Joe Biden's on civil rights, my response would be exactly the same: he's not a racist.

    Can you give examples of Biden's civil rights record?
  • TruthSeeker · 1 year ago
    I have a feeling O's vp is Wes Clark. Maybe all that stuff about him not having a role at the convention could be to throw the reporters off the scent.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    Good point; still, in my mind, he's just another Clintonista.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    I knew about the "articulate" comment, but I had no idea about the others. Damn Joe Biden.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    Plus he's got the lousiest hair job in the country. Anyone too cheap to give himself a better rug on his pate has got to have some problems.
  • Angela1 · 1 year ago
    fyi from www.NPR.org

    Cindy McCain's Half Sister 'Angry' She's Hidden
    by Ted Robbins

    Ted Robbins/NPR

    Kathleen Hensley Portalski displays newspaper clippings of her father in World War II, as well as snapshots of herself as a child with her father.


    Courtesy Nicholas Portalski
    Portalski is shown with her late father, Jim Hensley, who also was Cindy McCain's father.



    Ted Robbins/NPR
    Nicholas Portalski, whose mother is McCain's half sister, says it's "very, very hurtful" that he and his mother haven't been recognized.


    All Things Considered, August 18, 2008 · Last Tuesday, NPR broadcast a story about Cindy McCain's business and charity work. In it, Ted Robbins described McCain as the only child of Jim Hensley, a wealthy Arizona businessman. The next morning, NPR received an e-mail from Nicholas Portalski of Phoenix, who heard the story with his mother.

    "We were listening to the piece about Cindy McCain on NPR, All Things Considered, and it just struck us very hard," Portalski said.

    His mother, Kathleen Hensley Portalski, is also Hensley's daughter.

    The Portalski family is accustomed to hearing Cindy McCain described as Hensley's only child.

    She's been described that way by news organizations from The New Yorker and The New York Times to Newsweek and ABC.

    McCain herself routinely uses the phrase "only child," as she did on CNN last month. "I grew up with my dad," she said then. "I'm an only child. My father was a cowboy, and he really loved me very much, but I think he wanted a son occasionally."

    McCain's father was also a businessman — and twice a father.

    "I'm upset," Kathleen Portalski says. "I'm angry. It makes me feel like a nonperson, kind of."

    Who Is Kathleen Hensley Portalski?

    Documents show Kathleen Anne Hensley was born to Jim and Mary Jeanne Hensley on Feb. 23, 1943. They had been married for six years when Kathleen was born.

    Jim Hensley was a bombardier on a B-17, flying over Europe during World War II.

    He was injured and sent to a facility in West Virginia to recuperate. During that time, while still married to Mary Jeanne, Hensley met another woman — Marguerite Smith. Jim divorced Mary Jeanne and married Marguerite in 1945.

    Cindy Lou Hensley was born nine years later, in 1954.

    She may have grown up as an only child, but so did her half sister, Kathleen, who was raised by a single parent.

    Portalski says she did see her father and her half sister from time to time.

    "I saw him a few times a year," she says. "I saw him at Christmas and birthdays, and he provided money for school clothes, and he called occasionally."

    Jim Hensley also provided credit cards and college tuition for his grandchildren, as well as $10,000 gifts to Kathleen and her husband, Stanley Portalski. That lasted a decade, they say. By then, Jim Hensley had built Hensley and Co. into one of the largest beer distributorships in the country. He was worth tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars.

    Sole Inheritor To Hensley's Estate

    When Hensley died in 2000, his will named not only Portalski but also a daughter of his wife Marguerite from her earlier marriage. So, Cindy McCain may be the only product of Jim and Marguerite's marriage, but she is not the only child of either.

    She was, however, the sole inheritor of his considerable estate.

    Kathleen Portalski was left $10,000, and her children were left nothing. It's a fact Nicholas Portalski says his sister discovered the hard way.

    "What she found in town — on the day of or the day before or the day after his funeral — was that the credit card didn't work anymore," Nick says.

    The Portalskis live in a modest home in central Phoenix. Kathleen is retired, as is her husband. Nicholas Portalski is a firefighter and emergency medical technician looking for work.

    They say it would have been nice if they were left some of the Hensley fortune.

    They also say they are Democrats, but Nicholas Portalski says he had another reason for coming forward.

    "The fact that we don't exist," he says. "The fact that we've never been recognized, and then Cindy has to put such a fine point on it by saying something that's not true. Recently, again and again. It's just very, very hurtful."

    Kathleen Portalski says she'd like an acknowledgment and an apology.

    NPR asked the McCain campaign — specifically, Cindy McCain — to comment or respond. Neither replied.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    Speaking of hidden relatives, where are McCain's children from his first marriage? Are they on the campaign trail with him?
  • Town · 1 year ago
    One of his sons just stepped down from some bank that just failed. I think his daughter lives in Canada. The other son works for Cindy's Beer Business.
  • coop · 1 year ago
    Senator Obama is in the race of his life. Senator McCain, since the hiring of the Rove surrogates for his campaign, has really gone on the offensive and kept Senator Obama on the defensive. The McCain campaign says outrageous things knowing full well that Senator Obama will have to go on the defensive and in doing that make himself look, well, defensive. Case in point: Obama's a "celebrity," he's "playing the race card from the bottom of the deck up," he's "inexperienced" in foreign policy, he rather win at politics than win the war in Iraq, etc. Senator McCain says these things knowing that they're over the top, but he knows that in this low information age, these remarks will gain traction and further paint a picture of Senator Obama that touches on the "Other" that whites are subconsciously afraid of .
    With that being said, Senator Obama has got to pull the gloves off and fight. Now who's the best fighter out there? Senator Hillary Clinton. Now, I'm not endorsing her per se, but strategically she makes sense. She can go on the attack like no other Democrat, and her being selected outweighs any Republican veep pick. She'll garner more publicity and in doing so, she can set the terms of the attack.
    In addition, those PUMAs could finally be silenced. Let's face it, they are vocal and determined to undermine Senator Obama's campaign, but with Hillary as number two, they can finally be silenced and, very importantly,not be wooed by Senator McCain.
    Plus, Senator Obama needs to announce his cabinet at the convention. It should be a truly bipartisan cabinet with Senator Biden as Secretary of State, and Senator Hegel maybe as Secretary of Defense. This stuff about Biden being racist is really elementary. Let's not get sidetracked by this. All of us say silly things, and we talk about "the white folks" all the time. Some of what we say in conversations with each other could be termed "racist." We have bigger fish to fry here, We're trying to elect a black man to the White House, and to do so we have to play with the big boys, and the Republicans do not play the radio when it comes to low down and dirty politics. So we can keep our hands clean and lose,or we can do some things that will trump our opponents and win. I for one feel that Senator Clinton as vice-president and the announcement of a bipartisan cabinet at the convention will go a long way in stealing a lot of the Republican's thunder.
  • Town · 1 year ago
    Your logic is faulty regarding the PUMAs. Nothing will silence the PUMAs except Barack Obama getting up on the stage and saying "For the good of the country, I am withdrawing from the race and urge everyone to vote for Sen. Clinton." From where I stand, if Obama needs Clinton that badly to win, he shouldn't be up there. He should step down and let Clinton run against McCain. If he's that weak that only Hillary Clinton (and ONLY Hillary Clinton) can help him win, he doesn't need to be up there in the first place, which is what the PUMAs have been arguing all along.

    Let's get down to the nitty gritty, shall we? A lot of these PUMAs and Billaries are mad because they paid a pretty penny to have access to power. They thought they would have complete access to Hillary when she was elected. That's why they were supporting her and paying Bill handsome sums to "speak." But Obama stepped right in and "took it away". Lady de Rothschild has now just lost her access to the White House. PUMA fundraisers have lost their access to power. The Hillraisers have lost their access to power. The Clinton aides have lost their access to power. The talking heads on ABC, NBC, CNN, etc. have lost their access to power. If Obama wins, who will the news networks want to talk to? Stephanopoulous or David Axelrod?

    And most importantly, Bill Clinton has lost his access to the White House.


    These wealthy white people who thought they were going to have access to the Clinton White House in January are pissed. Putting H. Clinton on the ticket does nothing for these people because the power would rest with OBAMA, not Clinton.


    It doesn't matter if Hillary is on the ticket or not, they're not going to vote for Obama.
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    Good analysis.
  • Sepia · 1 year ago
    PREACH!
  • Lilytiger · 1 year ago
    Town sees things so clearly!
  • rikyrah · 1 year ago
    Town,

    You're always on point. And, you tell the truth. I, too, would just like for them to come out and admit:
    a) that they won't vote for Obama under ANY circumstances
    b) the true reasons why
  • D. · 1 year ago
    From the other side of the street: I strongly, strongly, strongly disagree on Obama announcing a cabinet anywhere before the election.

    Talk about playing into the "presumptious" theme......
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    What if McCain annouces a cabinet before the election?
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    AHEM...the word is "announces"
    Damn fingers.
  • D. · 1 year ago
    LOL.

    From me, the same would apply to McCain.

    Not only presumptious, but terrible strategy.
  • coop · 1 year ago
    One more thing in terms of strategy. Don't forget that is Senator Obama picks Senator Clinton and wins, then he'll knock her out of contention to run against him in 2012. She would be foolish to run against an incumbent Democratic president. On the other hand, if he loses this election, then the path is cleared for Senator Clinton. Senator Obama will not have the chance to run again. The stars just will not be aligned as they are now for a black man to have a realistic chance at the White House. So in essence in picking her he weakens her chances for the White House and strengthens his. I believe that he could contain her because she doesn't want to make herself look bad, and whatever we think of President Clinton, he's an effective, charismatic campaigner, and his star power could really boost the Obama ticket.
    So once again, think strategy. The opponent is Senator McCain and the Rovian tactics that drive the country apart. The Democrats need to get over themselves and unite, and they can do so by embarking on winning strategies such as an Obama-Clinton ticket and a bipartisan cabinet, all done at the convention to garner maximum coverage and momentum which will trump anything the Republicans could muster.
  • Town · 1 year ago
    If Obama picks "John Doe" and wins, he knocks Clinton out of contention to run against him in '12. Even if he loses, he's provided a blueprint on how to beat the Clintons; the "inevitability" meme has been punctured.
  • Miranda · 1 year ago
    "Don't forget that is Senator Obama picks Senator Clinton and wins, then he'll knock her out of contention to run against him in 2012. She would be foolish to run against an incumbent Democratic president."

    So, you really don't see why that makes no sense?
  • Vic · 1 year ago
    It's hard to believe, but the Presidentian race seems to be tightening up, probably due to Karl Rove's sleazy help. I'll accept anyone Obama chooses for VP, so long as it will get him elected. Noboby elected Karl Rove for anything, but he seems to inject his slime into the Presidency over and over again. I think that picking a vote-getting VP is more important than picking one on any other basis. I don't particularly care for any of the possibilities, but I'm voting for Obama and that's all I can do.
  • Vic · 1 year ago
    Ahem....I meant to say, Presidential, not what my fingers typed incorrectly.
  • Webb · 1 year ago
    My biggest complaint about Biden is not his verbal missteps or plagiarism.

    Biden championed bankruptcy reform laws on behalf of all the credit card companies in Delaware. Those policies have been detrimental to people who are now suffering through the sub-prime mortgage crisis. So, his actions have spoke louder than his words.

    At this point, I'll wait for *O*s decision and try to rationalize it after it happens.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    The Orange Empire's denizens still derisively call him not the Democrat from Delaware (D-DE), but the Democrat from Maryland Bank, NA (D-MBNA).
  • Town · 1 year ago
    http://www.tribbleagency.com/?p=1747

    This website claims that OBAMASEBELIUS.COM is owned by the Obama campaign.
  • pmof2 · 1 year ago
    Joe Biden isn't a racist. Joe Biden can be REALLY, REALLY STUPID in the things he says, and often needs to take a couple of beats before he opens his mouth, but he isn't a racist.

    I reserve that label--I don't think it should be thrown around too casually.

    I worked on Capitol Hill (Senate side) for 10 years. You get to know who's who and what's what with the Members. My personal interactions with him, the "inside 411" I would hear from other staff, and the way I observed him over many years, make me very confident in asserting he is no racist.

    I have mixed feelings about his being the VP pick, though. All the pros and cons have already been outlined in this thread. My fantasy choice has always been Richardson.

    I've trusted Barack to this point, so I see no reason to stop now. Unless his chooses HIllary. Then, all bets are off. :- )

    In all seriousness, let's just focus on having a great, history-making, mind-blowing convention, and then winning this thing. We have to win. I don't want any distractions. He's got to win. That MUST be our focus.
  • JibreelRiley · 1 year ago
    Joe Biden is not a Racist however it dose help that he is a Democrat!
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    So that's all it takes? Holy Cow. He is not a racist because he is a Democrat. If he was a Republican he probably would have been run out of town on rails by the media....don't ya think?
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    Yep...win at all costs. It's all about the power...we should worry about his ability to run the country LAST. Just win, baby.

    Tip.........he should focus on some sort of a plan don't you think? Ideas win elections...but he may be able to do it with hype alone these days. The people will come around when it comes to voting...Carey was winning, Gore was winning...the media put them there and the American people sent them home eventually. Sound familiar?
  • pmof2 · 1 year ago
    Good Lord, Carson. Who took away your all your toys this morning? You're a little grumpy. Go outside and enjoy the day. Talk a walk. Clear your head.

    You may also want to find a site that is more in line with your thinking, so you won't feel the need to do battle with every commenter here. Geez.

    Now, to respond substantively to your remarks, yes, I do believe that Barack must win. He has to win in order to make the changes I feel we need in this country. I believe he is the best person to lead at this point in history. You clearly don't agree, and since this is America, I'll celebrate your right to hold a different opinion, but I'm a little weary of the condescension. What does that do for you exactly?

    Cheers!
  • Town · 1 year ago
    Why Hillary shouldn't even be considered:

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/b...
  • Big Man · 1 year ago
    Thank you all for posting this. Previously I had no problem with Biden, but now homie is unacceptable. That last comment about the schools was the most telling. "Look what you're starting off with" tells me something about how he views black people. And that slave state joke just made things even more clear.
  • blksista · 1 year ago
    Same here...this is like a bad trip down Memory Lane.
  • jon · 1 year ago
    Great post ... just like with the Clinton attacks Obama wiki, putting the "incidents" together like this really does highlight a pattern ...
  • Caroline · 1 year ago
    Anyone who thinks Biden is racist clearly knows nothing of his record or all the fine things he has done for the citizens of Delaware (including many AA citizens), and the dependent, neglected and abused children of Delaware via the children's agencies. Don't listen to this garbage, Joe. We who know you know the fine man you truly are!
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    And like all Libs...he did it with your (and my) tax dollars. Not a spending cut in site. Any fool can do that. Let the games begin. This ticket will get smoked.
  • Val · 1 year ago
    agreed Caroline.


    Go OBAMA/BIDEN 08
  • libhomo · 1 year ago
    Biden's vote for the Iraq war was the act of a genocidal racist.
  • Adam · 1 year ago
    I'm cool with Biden, despite the things he said in the past. My main reason for this can be summed up in one word . . . Michelle.

    I don't think anybody could be Obama's VP without Michelle's approval. She is too vital to Barack.

    So if Michelle looked Biden in the eyes, talked to him and then gave the Barack the OK, then I'm alright with it.
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    That's as pathetic as it gets.
  • Admiral_Komack · 1 year ago
    Biden on Obama's VP Pick: 'I'm Not The Guy'
    August 19, 2008 5:21 PM

    ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf and Jennifer Parker report: As Delaware Sen. Joe Biden was leaving his house in Wilmington this afternoon, he slowed down and said to the gathered news reporters outside his home: "Hey guys, I'm not the guy. See ya."

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08...
  • JunePearl · 1 year ago
    That is a HUUUUUUUUUGE relief! Now, all I need to do is hear Billary say the same thing and I'll be ok.
  • wondering · 1 year ago
    So why did the NAACP give him a 100% rating for the 109th congress?
  • Carson · 1 year ago
    Because he is a a liberal. NAACP doesn't care if you are racist....that's what they are...racists. Racism doesn't bother them, Conservatives do. Get with the program.
  • Rudy · 1 year ago
    Obama/Sebelius '08
  • Eetfaq · 1 year ago
    Hey, good call on this one. I'm definitely bookmarking this blog!
  • eatcrow · 1 year ago
    Yumm, words taste good.
  • obamish · 1 year ago
    Obama starts off (and ends) with the only pick worse than Hillary? Some change.
  • Teresa · 1 year ago
    Hillary would have been a great pick. Neither she nor Bill said anything about Obama that he did not say about himself and his campaign at some point... including that he would win SC because of the large black population......but they are soooooooooo racist right? Please
    No, instead he choses a real racist and bigot and do not fool yourself, his supporters will not care. IOIYAO (it's okay if you are Obama).
  • andrew · 1 year ago
    "Oh really? Biden has a history of racially insensitive and offensive remarks. Google “Biden + Racism” and you get over 440,000 results documenting his racist bloopers,"

    I just typed in McCain + racist and I got 3,380,000 results. So by your logic I guess he's a much bigger racist than Biden
  • DAMathis · 1 year ago
    WHETHER YOU LIKED CLARENCE THOMAS OR NOT YOU HAD BETTER REMEMBER HOW BIDEN SHOWED OUT DURING THOSE HEARINGS AND WE ARE JUST SUPPOSED TO FORGET THAT "HIGH TECH" LYNCH MOB THAT HE LED???? DO NOT HIT THAT SNOOZE BUTTON ANYMORE....

    HE RAGGED ON BARACK AND WE ARE SUPPOSED TO JUST CHALK HIM UP TO A STUPID WHITE PERSON???? HE IS A RACIST!!!!!!!! END OF STORY!!!!
  • andrew · 1 year ago
    Yeah, he went against Clarence Thomas because he's a racist... it has nothing to do with the fact that Clarence Thomas is a CONSERVATIVE and Biden is a LIBERAL!!!!
  • andrew · 1 year ago
    Oh, btw... in case your IQ isn't quite at the level to recognize sarcasm... my last message was oozing with it
  • rain · 1 year ago
    Okay people, what ever happened to "thinking for yourself" and researching information..especially when it has been posted on a blog. And FOX News is not a reliable source (if you are a liberal, that is) Lets do some critical thinking here....PLEASE.
  • Andree Socolov · 7 months ago
    I really like Obama and I have respect for him, which I consider very important. As I've read, lots of people are still taking racist actions against his decision, but they are big fools!
    _____________
    Hotels Spain
  • D. · 1 year ago
    Don't know if y'all heard, but I think it's safe to rule out Wesley Clark.